Create Composite Ranking of Items Ranked in Multiple Categories

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on creating a composite ranking system for items categorized by multiple criteria, specifically in the context of evaluating houses based on affordability, location, and design. The proposed method involves calculating a score by multiplying each house's ranking in a category by the category's importance, summing these products, and normalizing the score to a percentage. The user seeks a more robust approach than the initial method and considers ranking systems such as Borda, Condorcet, and Range for evaluation. The suggestion is made to assess these systems based on specific attributes and their importance to determine the most effective ranking method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of composite ranking systems
  • Familiarity with Borda, Condorcet, and Range voting systems
  • Knowledge of normalization techniques in scoring
  • Basic principles of weighted scoring methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to implement Borda count in ranking systems
  • Explore Condorcet methods and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making
  • Study normalization techniques for score adjustment in ranking systems
  • Investigate the Range voting system and its effectiveness in composite rankings
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for data analysts, decision-making specialists, and real estate professionals who are involved in ranking and evaluating options based on multiple criteria.

unam1292
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

So the idea is that I'm trying to create a composite ranking system of items that are already in different categories. For example, suppose there are 4 houses that a buyer is choosing from. These 4 houses are ranked 1-4 in each of the categories such as affordability, location, and design. These categories are then rated Very Important to Not Important (1-4, respectively). I want to create a final ranking of the housings based on this data. What's the best way to do this?

What I've thought of:

Pick a house, and multiply its ranking in a category by the importance of that category. Continue to do this for that house for each category, continuing to add to the score. Then divide this score by the maximum score which is the summation of the importance values. Then finally multiply this by 100 to get a percentage match score.

Here's the idea:
Ʃ(house ranking in a category*importance of that category)/Ʃ(importances) * 100

I feel like this is too simplistic and results in error. What would be a better way?

The important thing is coming up with a relevant score value for each house. I've looked at Borda, Condorcet, and Range systems as examples, but I'm not sure what is best.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Ʃ(house ranking in a category*importance of that category) does all the work.
The rest is just 'normalization' - scaling for convenience.

With this scheme the lower the score the better:
A house ranked #1 in all 4 categories would have a score of 10.
A house ranked #4 in all 4 categories would have a score of 40.
 


unam1292 said:
The important thing is coming up with a relevant score value for each house. I've looked at Borda, Condorcet, and Range systems as examples, but I'm not sure what is best.

Why don't you evaluate the Borda, Condorcet and Range systems according to a set of attributes, rank those attributes for importance and then select the system that scores best?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K