Creating a Mini Self-Sustaining Star: The Superstrong Chamber Experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical creation of a mini self-sustaining star within a superstrong chamber capable of withstanding extreme conditions. It is established that a main sequence star primarily consists of hydrogen undergoing fusion into helium at temperatures around 10 million kelvin. The challenges include managing the immense pressure and temperature generated during fusion, as well as the need for a containment system, such as magnetic fields. While generating brief instances of fusion is feasible, achieving a true self-sustaining star remains unrealistic without natural gravitational forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrogen fusion processes
  • Knowledge of extreme temperature management techniques
  • Familiarity with containment systems, including magnetic confinement
  • Basic principles of stellar formation and balance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced engineering techniques for fusion reactors
  • Explore magnetic confinement fusion methods
  • Study the physics of stellar formation and gravitational forces
  • Investigate materials capable of withstanding extreme temperatures and pressures
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, nuclear engineers, and anyone interested in fusion technology and theoretical astrophysics will benefit from this discussion.

Mr. Paradox
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
If someone had a superstrong chamber that could withstand anything (hypothetically) if they constantlty fed the correct materials at the correct state into the chamber could they create a mini self sustaining star?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
All a star, or a main sequence star, at least, is is a ball of hydrogen which fuses it into helium in its core. So if you manage to generate hydrogen fusion in some sort of chamber, yes, that's pretty much what a star is.

The problem is, of course, that the temperature for fusion is ~10 million kelvin, and containing something that hot is a bit of an issue. As soon as fusion ignites, there will also be a ridiculous amount of pressure, coupled with the temperature, which make it difficult to create any kind of self-sustaining laboratory star. But, assuming you have some super strong material, then yes.
 
In the strictest sense of the word "star," I think that it must be held together by its own gravity. In a laboratory setting, this would be rather unrealistic; we would need to provide some pressure or some other kind of containment system (like magnetic fields, etc.). Ignoring that, though, we can generate a small amount of fusion, as was already mentioned.
 
Mr. Paradox said:
If someone had a superstrong chamber that could withstand anything (hypothetically) if they constantlty fed the correct materials at the correct state into the chamber could they create a mini self sustaining star?
If you have to artificially compress it, and feed it the correct materials, it's not exactly self-sustaining then, is it?


But that aside, isn't this pretty much what a fusion reactor does?
 
Thank you all for your help! I feel educated, thank you for the answer to my question.
 
A star has a delicate balance between, the explosive force going on in its core that tends to want to blow it up, and the high gravity which wants to push it into a little ball.

The difficulty in creating a star, no matter how brief, is to find the correct balance.
 
So creating a star would take extremely large amounts of calculations
 
Mr. Paradox said:
So creating a star would take extremely large amounts of calculations
Well... yes but what it would take mostly is incredibly-advanced engineering.
 
  • #10
If only if only. I yearn for the future haha
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
14K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
79
Views
9K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K