Creating a non-cubic polynomial

  • Thread starter Thread starter rainyrabbit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around creating a non-cubic polynomial that meets specific conditions regarding its behavior at the x-axis. The original poster seeks to construct a polynomial that crosses the x-axis at -2, touches the x-axis at 1, and remains above the x-axis between these points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the possibility of using a quintic polynomial to maintain the desired end behavior while satisfying the given conditions. There are discussions about the implications of multiplying a polynomial by factors like (x^2 + 1) and how this affects the x-intercepts.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various attempts to define the polynomial, with some participants suggesting specific factors that could be used. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's confusion regarding polynomial behavior and the effects of certain multiplications. No consensus has been reached, but several lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the original poster's limited background in calculus and precalculus, which may influence their understanding of polynomial behavior and the implications of certain mathematical operations.

rainyrabbit
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Would you please give one or two (or more, sorry hehehe) to help me?

How can you make up a polynomial that:
- crosses the x-axis at -2
- just touches the x-axis at 1 ("touch" as the graph y=x^2 would only touch, not cross, the x-axis)
- and is above the x-axis between -2 and 1.

I know there must be equations that are not cubic that satisfy these conditions. Oh and the graph contains no additional contact with the x-axis. How would you create the equation? Please help^^
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the equation can't be cubic, then make it quintic (highest term x^5) so it will have the same end behavior.

Let's say that you have a polynomial that is cubic with these properties (do you?). Then can you predict what would happen if you multiply it by (for example) (x^2 + 1)?
 
Last edited:
So you want a function [tex]f(x)[/tex] such that:

[tex]\frac{df}{dx}=0[/tex] and [tex]\frac{d^2f}{dx^2}<0[/tex] at [tex]x=1[/tex]

and

[tex]f(-2)=0[/tex]...
 
well very many thanks I give you. Sorry, I am only at precalculus and just at the basic level, so I don't really know what happens when you multiply an equation by (x^2 + 1), but as I tried doing that it worked! The graph of the quintic equation looks very similar to my original cubic equation lol^^

Oh and J77, I'm afraid I do not yet know calculus. Sorry hehehe...

EDIT: Oh I just figured out why. Adding the factor (x^2 + 1) does not add additional x-intercepts!
 
Last edited:
rainyrabbit said:
Would you please give one or two (or more, sorry hehehe) to help me?

How can you make up a polynomial that:
- crosses the x-axis at -2
So one factor is (x-(-2))= (x+2)
- just touches the x-axis at 1 ("touch" as the graph y=x^2 would only touch, not cross, the x-axis)
Okay, the parabola is tangent to the x-axis and another factor is
(x-1)2

- and is above the x-axis between -2 and 1.
(x+2)(x-1)2 itself, at x= 0, is (0+2)(-1)2= 2 which is "above" the x-axis- i.e. positive. Since a polynomial is of one sign between places where it is 0 and (x+2)(x-1)2 is 0 only at -2 and 1, it's positive between -2 and 1: it looks to me like that works.

I know there must be equations that are not cubic that satisfy these conditions. Oh and the graph contains no additional contact with the x-axis. How would you create the equation? Please help^^

Yes, there are "equation" (I assume you mean polygons) that are not cubic yet satisfy these equation. For example, multiply (x+2)(x-1)2 by x2+1 which is always positive and, since x2+ 1 is never 0, does not cross or touch the x-axis at any other point. But why? Your original problem did not state that the polynomial must be not be cubic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K