Creating Schrödinger cat states with trapped ions

Marioweee
Messages
18
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
We will consider that the ion is in an harmonic trap. The ion has two internal states |g⟩ and |s⟩ and it interacts with a laser that induces a state-dependent force. The quantum dynamics is governed by the Hamiltonian

$$H = H_R + H_f$$
$$H_R = Ω(|s><g| + |g><s|)$$
$$H_f = g(|s><s| − |g><g|)(a^\dagger + a)$$

HR induces Rabi oscillations between internal states. Hf describes an optical force that depends on the state of the
ion. Note that the operator $(a^\dagger + a)$ is proportional to the position of the ion. The force’s sign depends on the internal state of the ion, such that

$$|s⟩ → Hf = g(a^\dagger + a)$$
$$|g⟩ → Hf = −g(a^\dagger + a)$$

1. Imagine the ion is initially in the ground state
|ψ1⟩ = |g⟩|0⟩, where |g⟩ is the electronic ground state and |0⟩ is the ground state of the vibrational degrees of freedom (zero phonons). We consider that there is no applied force and the Rabi term HR acts for a time $t=\frac{\pi}{4\Omega}$ . After that, the state of the ion is
|ψ2⟩ = (a|g⟩ + b|s⟩)|0⟩ Calculate a and b.

2. Now we turn off the Rabi term (Ω = 0) and let the state-dependent force act for a time τ .Show that the state of the ion is
|ψ2⟩ = a|g⟩|α⟩ + b|s⟩| − α⟩
and calculate the value of α.
Relevant Equations
-
I have already solved question number 1 by applying the schrödinger equation obtaining that

$$\ket{\psi_2}(t) = \cos(\Omega t)\ket{g} - i \sin (\Omega t)\ket{s}$$

and therefore in ##t=\frac{\pi}{4\Omega}##

$$\ket{\psi_2}(t) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\ket{g} - i \ket{s})$$

I have some doubts about the second exercise. What I have tried is the following

$$|ψ(t)⟩ = e^{-iH_f t}\dfrac{1}{\sqrt(2)}(|g⟩ -i |s⟩)\ket{0} = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt(2)}(e^{it}|g⟩ -i e^{-it} |s⟩)\otimes e^{-igt(a^\dagger + a)}\ket{0}$$

I think that

$$e^{-ig(a^\dagger + a)}\ket{0}$$

should be something proportional to ##\ket{\alpha} = \ket{-igt}## (because of the displacement operator). But the displacement operator proportional to ##a^\dagger - a## so im a bit confused. Moreover, the ##e^{it}## and ##e^{-it}## terms make me think something is wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Marioweee said:
I think that

$$e^{-ig(a^\dagger + a)}\ket{0}$$

should be something proportional to ##\ket{\alpha} = \ket{-igt}## (because of the displacement operator).
It is a harmonic oscillator, so ##a## and ##a^\dagger## are ladder operators.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top