Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am currently preparing myself for my Bachelor thesis in local quantum field theory. I was encouraged by my advisor to read the books of M. Reed and Simon because of my lag of functional analysis experience but I have quite often problems understand the “obvious” conclusions.

For example:

Why is the creation operator not a densely defined operator? And how do I proof that formally correctly? I am not asking for a step by step solution but I have absolutely no idea how to start.

Reed, Simon define the creation operator as:

$$(a^\dagger(p)(\psi))^{(n)}(k_1,...k_n) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \sum_{l=1}^n \delta(p-k_l) \psi^{(n-1)}(k_1,...,k_{l-1},k_k,...,k_n)$$

as the adjoint of the annihilation operator :

$$(a(p)\psi)^{(n)}(k_1,...k_n) = \sqrt{n+1} \psi^{(n+1)}(p,k_1,...k_n)$$

with $$\psi$$ a Schwartz function.

I really appreciate any hints.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Creation Operator is not a densely defined operator...

Loading...

Similar Threads - Creation Operator densely | Date |
---|---|

I Solving the Schrödinger eqn. by commutation of operators | Jan 8, 2018 |

I Creation operator and Wavefunction relationship | Jul 4, 2017 |

I Creation and annihilation operator commutation confusion | Oct 29, 2016 |

A Annihilation creation operators in case of half H.oscillator | Sep 12, 2016 |

I Kronecker delta by using creation/annihilation operators | Jun 23, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**