ahsanxr
- 350
- 6
Correct me if I'm wrong but if Pakistan and India win their respective quarter finals they both face each other in the semis right?
The discussion revolves around the Cricket World Cup 2011, focusing on participants' engagement with the tournament, their national teams, and the overall performance of various teams. The scope includes opinions on matches, player performances, and the atmosphere surrounding the event.
Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding team performances and the quality of matches. There is no clear consensus on which team is favored to win, and various opinions on the nature of the tournament and its matches remain contested.
Some discussions reflect assumptions about the nature of pitches and match outcomes, as well as varying levels of engagement with the tournament based on geographic location and cricketing history.
Fans of cricket, particularly those interested in the dynamics of the Cricket World Cup and the performances of different national teams, may find this discussion engaging.
ahsanxr said:Correct me if I'm wrong but if Pakistan and India win their respective quarter finals they both face each other in the semis right?
And 7 for 50 today. They're getting really good at this.George Jones said:9 for 29!
AlephZero said:when they are good, they are very very good, but when they are bad ...
AlephZero said:It depends which way Pakistan play. Like the old Engiish nursery rhyme, when they are good, they are very very good, but when they are bad ...
matt.o said:I prefer "when they are good, they are good, when they are bad, someone has made a lot of money!"![]()
ahsanxr said:Thats harsh!
matt.o said:Pakistan dominated the Windies! Great display of spin bowling from Hafeez, Ajmal and Afridi!
Ta dah! End of an era.ahsanxr said:And I think I was wrong about my last post. If Pakistan beat West Indies and India beat Australia, they'll be facing each other in the semi!
matt.o said:Well, there was certainly no crumbling of India's middle order last night! Ponting showed his mettle although Australia's other batsmen played some poor shots to get out at crucial times meaning there were no 100 plus partnerships and a total of 300 was not achievable. It was probably a mistake not to play the young leg spinner Smith, too, given the amount of turn in the track.
Well played India -- too good for Aus. this time round.
nismaratwork said:I love Au, but the Indian bowlers have been absurdly good for a LOOOOONG time now.
qspeechc said:The only team I think can stop them is Sri Lanka.
qspeechc said:Where do you get that from? India have a mediocre bowling attack. Zaheer Kahn is fantastic; Harbajan Singh is good sometimes, sometimes not, and they have no one else, really.
What about South Africa? Living up to their chokers tag. They should have easily beaten NZ, no offence, but they are a mediocre team. SA just has so many great players.
Well, I guess I'm backing India now. The only team I think can stop them is Sri Lanka.
I don't think any of these are worth anything these days. Bowling at 120-130 kmph with no movement is their speciality. Particular surprised to see Irfan Pathan. I think his brother bowls better than him these days!Ishant Sharma, Irfan Pathan, Rudra Pratap Singh, Munaf Patel
I felt really bad for the Aussies losing. And the idea of Pak vs Ind doesn't excite me at all, unlike everyone else in the sub-continent.