Crossing Mohawk Bridget: Vector Diagram & Time Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter pharaoh
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a scenario where Brigget swims across the Mohawk River, taking into account her swimming speed, the current of the river, and the width of the river. The subject area includes vector analysis and motion in two dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to diagram the vectors involved, calculate net velocity, and determine the time required to cross the river. There is a focus on the direction Brigget must swim to counteract the current.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations regarding Brigget's velocity and time to cross, while others have pointed out the need to clarify the direction she should swim relative to the current. There is recognition of the upstream component required to counter the eastbound current.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of swimming relative to the moving water versus the shore, which may affect the interpretation of the problem.

pharaoh
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Brigget decides to swim over to Llenorce from the south shore. given she can swim at 5 m/s, the current is 3 m/s eastbound and the width of the mohawk river is 200 meter at that point. in what specific direction must she travel to reach its destination? Diagram the vectors, find her net velocity and detemine the time needed to cross the river?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show us your attempt to solve this problem.
 
25-9=16
square root of 16= 4 m/s
average velocity= d/t
200/4= 50 seconds
 
pharaoh said:
25-9=16
square root of 16= 4 m/s
average velocity= d/t
200/4= 50 seconds
That looks good. It appears you have recognized that she must swim somewhat upstream to cancel the effect of the current. Part of the question was the direction she must travel to accomplish this. I assume they meant travel relative to the moving water rather than the shore. Did you find the heading?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K