Crushing of objects due to forces

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 529879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of forces acting on an object resting on a table, specifically addressing the conditions under which an object can be crushed despite having a net force of zero. The scope includes conceptual understanding of forces, structural integrity, and the implications of net force in relation to deformation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that a net force of zero implies no acceleration of the object, questioning how crushing can occur under these conditions.
  • Others clarify that a net force of zero does not mean there are no forces acting on the object, as the forces can still be balanced while affecting structural integrity.
  • It is noted that net force is relevant for the acceleration of the object but not for the crushing or deformation of the object.
  • One participant uses the analogy of a stretched spring to illustrate that internal tensions can lead to deformation even when net force is zero.
  • Another point raised is that while the center of mass may not accelerate, individual parts of the object can still experience inward acceleration during a crushing motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of net force being zero, with some emphasizing the distinction between net force and internal forces related to deformation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between these concepts and the conditions for crushing.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding internal stresses and structural integrity, suggesting that the discussion may depend on definitions of force and deformation. There are unresolved aspects regarding how these forces interact in the context of crushing.

member 529879
If an object is resting on a table and is pushed downward it has an opposite and equal normal force that counteracts the applied and gravitational forces making the net force on the object 0. If the net force on an object being pushed against a table is 0, how can it be crushed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scheuerf said:
If an object is resting on a table and is pushed downward it has an opposite and equal normal force that counteracts the applied and gravitational forces making the net force on the object 0. If the net force on an object being pushed against a table is 0, how can it be crushed?
Typically, when people say "net force" they are talking about bulk motion (it makes the whole object move). It doesn't have anything to do with structural integrity. Nor does a net force of zero mean there is no force acting on the object -- obviously, the two forces are still there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 529879
Just because there is "no net force" acting on an object doesn't mean that there are no forces acting on it. It just means that the forces acting on it are in balance with one another.

Chet
 
Net force is only relevant for the acceleration of the object, not crushing of the object.
 
The internal tensions (stress) are relevant for deformations. Think about a spring stretched by a force applied to one end (the other end is attached somewhere). You have the same situation. Net force is zero but you have a deformation. And you have a tension in the spring.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 529879 and Chestermiller
Scheuerf said:
If the net force on an object being pushed against a table is 0, how can it be crushed?
No net force means that the center of mass will not accelerate. Each end can certainly accelerate inward In a crushing motion, that is not restricted by the second law.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K