Solving Cubic Equation: Positive Root Exists

  • Thread starter Thread starter littleHilbert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Roots
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the cubic equation \(x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c = 0\) has at least one positive root when \(c\) is negative. The participants analyze the behavior of the polynomial by considering its equivalent form for large \(|x|\) and applying the properties of roots. They conclude that if one root is real and the product of the roots is positive, at least one root must be positive. Additionally, they suggest using the Mean Value Theorem to demonstrate the existence of a root in a specific interval.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cubic equations and their roots
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and their continuity
  • Knowledge of the Mean Value Theorem in calculus
  • Basic concepts of complex conjugates and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Mean Value Theorem in root-finding
  • Explore the properties of cubic polynomials and their discriminants
  • Learn about the behavior of polynomial functions at infinity
  • Investigate the relationship between real and complex roots in polynomials
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra and calculus, mathematicians interested in polynomial root behavior, and educators teaching cubic equations and their properties.

littleHilbert
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that for negative c (a,b,c - real) equation x^3+ax^2+bx+c=0 has at least one positive root.
2. The attempt at a solution

Considering the equivalent form of the equation above for large |x|:
x^3(1+\frac{a}{x}+\frac{b}{x^2}+\frac{c}{x^3})=0 we can conclude that there exists at least one real root, because the function changes signes if x does the same.

Let r,s,t be some roots of this equation. At least one of them is real. The cubic polynomial on LHS can be written in the form:
(x-r)(x-s)(x-t). Thus the equation admits the following form: x^3-(r+s+t)x^2+(rs+st+rt)x-rst=0. Comparing yields: -(r+s+t)=a, rs+st+rt=b and -rst=c. Now if for example r is real and so are s and t, then in order for c to be negative the product rst must be positive. This in turn is true only if at least one the factors is positive.

Is it correct?

Now the task says nothing about whether all the roots are assumed to be real or not. In case only one root is real, for example r, is it correct to say that the product st is real?

Is there another way to solve the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
littleHilbert said:
Now the task says nothing about whether all the roots are assumed to be real or not. In case only one root is real, for example r, is it correct to say that the product st is real?

If all are not real, then consider -rst=c. Supposing r is real, as above, then s and t must necessarily be complex conjugates of each other (otherwise the product rst would be complex, which is not allowed since c is real) , and so st>0, which gives r>0
 
There's a good approach to this problem using calculus.
 
littleHilbert said:

Is there another way to solve the problem?


You were getting close when you started thinking about changes of sign of the function. A polynomial is a continuous function, so if you can show it changes sign in some interval [0,X] for some (large) value of X, it has a root in that interval.
 
Yes, he understood that. That's why he asked "is this another way to solve the problem".
 
Mean Value Theorem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K