Cubic Formula: Is There a Unique Way to Write It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bruno Tolentino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Formula
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the cubic formula has a unique representation or if alternative forms exist. It acknowledges that while infinite rewrites are possible, many result in more complex expressions. The consensus suggests that the standard form is preferred for clarity and simplicity. Non-trivial variations can exist, but they often complicate the original formula. Ultimately, the standard cubic formula remains the most effective way to present solutions.
Bruno Tolentino
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
This formula:

cubic.gif


Is the unique form of write the cubic formula or exist other?

OBS: Can be that other formula can be get through of some formula like this:

c1375136dcd4335e890aa5b016157eb2.png


source: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhaskara_II
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are infinite ways to rewrite every formula. The most stupid way is to add +7-7 at the end, but there are many non-trivial ways to rewrite it. As far as I know, they all make the expression more complicated, that's why this form is used to present the solution.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K