Tips on writing a formula in rigorous way

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on writing rigorous mathematical formulas for a tool developed by the user. The user presents several formulations for the positive sum of PF values, including the use of the Heaviside function and conditional summation. The final recommendation is to use a concise notation that clearly indicates the condition for summation: $$P(l,1)=\sum_k PF(k,l)\: \mbox {where}\: PF(k,l)>0$$. This formulation balances elegance and clarity, making it suitable for diverse audiences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical notation and summation
  • Familiarity with the Heaviside function
  • Knowledge of conditional expressions in mathematics
  • Basic experience with formula writing in technical reports
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Heaviside function and its applications in mathematics
  • Explore conditional summation techniques in mathematical writing
  • Learn about best practices for writing technical reports
  • Investigate different notational conventions in mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, technical writers, and anyone involved in developing or documenting mathematical tools and formulas.

serbring
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
Dear,

I am writing a report of a tool I have developed where there is a chapter with all the formulas included in the tool. I have a formula like the following:

[tex]P(l,1)=\sum_k PF(k,l)[/tex]

but P(l,1) contains the sum of all the positive PFs, while P(l,2) contains the sum of all the negative PFs. Is there any elegant/rigorous way to write the formula?

thanks best regards
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
With the Heaviside function: $$P(l,1)=\sum_k PF(k,l) \Theta(PF(k,l))$$
A bit ugly but compact:$$P(l,1)=\sum_{k,PF(k,l)>0} PF(k,l)$$
Maybe like this:$$P(l,1)=\sum_k \begin{cases} PF(k,l) &\mbox{if } PF(k,l)> 0 \\
0 & \mbox{else } \end{cases} $$
If you need this type of sum often, you could introduce it and then shorten it to $$P(l,1)=\sum_k PF(k,l)\: \mbox {where}\: PF(k,l)>0$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
Wow! How many options! Thanks

The first one is very elegant, I like it, but not fully clear for everyone. I would go for the last one!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K