Curl of field in cylindrical coordinates

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the curl of a vector field in cylindrical coordinates, specifically addressing the placement of the 1/rho term in the determinant calculation. Participants express confusion over how this term is incorporated and its relevance in the context of cylindrical coordinates. One user references the "Elements of Electromagnetics" textbook to support their understanding of the curl's formulation. Clarifications are made regarding the determinant's structure and the implications of the 1/r term, leading to a resolution of the initial confusion. The conversation concludes with a mutual understanding of the determinant's correct application in the curl calculation.
FOIWATER
Gold Member
Messages
434
Reaction score
12
I am asked to compute the Curl of a vector field in cylindrical coordinates,

I apologize for not being able to type the formula here I do not have that program.

I do not see how the the 1/rho outside the determinant calculation is being carried in?

Not for the specific problem - but for curl in other coordinates in general.

1/rho det(arho rho*bphi cz
d/drho d/dphi d/dz
Arho rho*Atheta Az)

I'm staring at it a long time, - I don't see how it expands as it does..

Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you come by a 1/r outside the determinant?

The determinant for computing curl A is

1r/r 1ψ k/r
∂/∂r ∂/∂ψ ∂/∂z
Ar rAψ Az

I used r instead of rho and ψ instead of phi since phi is not available on the PF symbol table.

There is no 1/r term in front of the determinant.
 
There is for cylindrical coordinates

At least in most things I have come across

I am referencing the 5th edition of "elements of electromagnetics"
 
FOIWATER said:
There is for cylindrical coordinates

At least in most things I have come across

I am referencing the 5th edition of "elements of electromagnetics"

What I gave you and what you said are the same thing. Your version brings 1/r outside the determinant, then multiplies all my terms by r. It's a dumb way of giving the determinant in my opinion, but it's correct also.

What did you say was your problem with it again? I couldn''t figure out what your confusion is.
 
Only the row by which cofactors are expanded, though?
 
nvm I understand it now, thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K