Current through Ballistic 2DEG Channel

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the time-independent Schrödinger Equation for a ballistic 2DEG channel using a specific Hamiltonian. The primary challenge is to solve the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation, which is expressed as ( -\frac{h^2}{2m^{*}}(\frac{d^2}{dx^2} + \frac{d^2}{dy^2}) + \frac{1}{2}m^* \omega^2 (x^2+y^2) - E )\Psi = 0. Participants emphasize the importance of obtaining energy eigenvalues and eigenstates below the Fermi energy to determine the number of available channels, which is then used in the formula I = N(2e^2)/h V for current calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the time-independent Schrödinger Equation
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of energy eigenvalues and eigenstates
  • Basic concepts of ballistic transport in two-dimensional electron gases (2DEG)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn methods for solving the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation, including separation of variables and Green's function techniques
  • Study the implications of energy eigenvalues on channel availability in quantum systems
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between voltage and current in ballistic transport using I = N(2e^2)/h V
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in condensed matter physics, and engineers working with two-dimensional electron gases (2DEG) in semiconductor devices will benefit from this discussion.

FermiFrustration
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
See attachment!
Find current through ballistic 2DEG channel assuming a parabolic potential in the channel
Relevant Equations
Schrödinger Equation, Airy's Equation, I = N (2e^2)/h V
So I am a bit uncertain what approach is best for solving this problem and how exactly I should approach it, but my strategy right now is:

1. Solve the time-independent Schrödinger Equation with the given Hamiltonian and find energy eigenvalues of system:
-Here I struggle a bit with actually solving it; if my approach is right this should be the crux of the problem
-Since the y and x-dependent parts of the Schrödinger equation are possible to separate I think it is possible to solve this as two differential equations with only one variable like:

## ( -\frac{h^2}{2m^{*}}(\frac{d^2}{dx^2} + \frac{d^2}{dy^2}) + \frac{1}{2}m^* \omega^2 y^2 - E )\Psi = 0 ##
## (-\frac{h^2}{2m^{*}}\frac{d^2}{dx^2} - E )\Psi = (\frac{h^2}{2m^{*}}\frac{d^2}{dy^2} - \frac{1}{2}m^* \omega^2 y^2)\Psi ##
## \implies ¨(-\frac{h^2}{2m^{*}}\frac{d^2}{dx^2} - E )\Psi = G ##
## \implies (\frac{h^2}{2m^{*}}\frac{d^2}{dy^2} - \frac{1}{2}m^* \omega^2 y^2)\Psi = G ##

-I am however unsure how to reassemble this into a complete solution.

2. Find energy eigenstates below the fermi energy - their number should be the number of available channels through the channel

3. Plug this new obtained N into I = N (2e^2)/h V with the given voltage from source to drainIs my approach right and how should I go about solving the differential equation?
 

Attachments

  • NanoP1.png
    NanoP1.png
    60.3 KB · Views: 191
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach is close, but you need to solve the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation with the given parameters, rather than separating it into two equations. The two-dimensional version of the Schrödinger equation is:## ( -\frac{h^2}{2m^{*}}(\frac{d^2}{dx^2} + \frac{d^2}{dy^2}) + \frac{1}{2}m^* \omega^2 (x^2+y^2) - E )\Psi = 0 ##There are several methods for solving this equation, such as separation of variables, Green's function techniques, and numerical methods. Once you have solved the equation to obtain the energy eigenvalues, you can then use those values to calculate the number of available channels through the channel, which you can then plug into I = N(2e^2)/h V with the given voltage from source to drain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K