Cute schoolrank tool applied to Astro departments likes Big Bounce :-D

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the use of the Cute schoolrank tool to evaluate astronomy and astrophysics departments in the United States. Users can manipulate "priorities" settings to generate different rankings based on preferences for department size and research productivity. Notable rankings include California Institute of Technology and Princeton University at the top, while Pennsylvania State University ranks fifth, attributed to its research in loop quantum cosmology. The conversation highlights the subjective nature of the rankings and the importance of understanding the context behind them.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of academic ranking systems
  • Familiarity with the Cute schoolrank tool
  • Knowledge of astronomy and astrophysics departments
  • Basic comprehension of loop quantum cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the features of the Cute schoolrank tool
  • Research the criteria for academic department rankings
  • Investigate loop quantum cosmology and its implications in astrophysics
  • Analyze the impact of department size on research output and quality
USEFUL FOR

Students, researchers, and academic advisors interested in evaluating and comparing astronomy and astrophysics programs, as well as those exploring the implications of research productivity in academic rankings.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
There are hundreds of options with this tool, so this is just an offthewall sample of what you can get:

http://graduate-school.phds.org/rankings/astronomy/rank/_M_M____________________________________________________________U

I'm not advising anyone to seriously use this, or believe in it, but just as something to try for fun. Different "priorities" settings will get you different rankings. Do you like large departments with a lot of students, or small departments with just a few students? And so on.

I set "priorities" more or less randomly with my eyes shut (general "quality" and "research productivity") and got this:

1-4 California Institute of Technology Astrophysics 1-7 1-4
1-4 Princeton University Astrophysical Science 1-10 1-3
1-5 University of California-Berkeley Astrophysics 1-6 2-9
3-12 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Astrophysics and Astronomy and Planetary Science 1-8 6-22
3-13 Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Astronomy and Astrophysics 6-23 2-9
4-13 University of Chicago Astronomy and Astrophysics 6-23 2-9
4-16 Harvard University Astronomy 3-15 7-23
3-18 Johns Hopkins University Astronomy and Astrophysics 2-22 6-20
5-20 University of Arizona Astronomy 5-22 5-21
5-18 University of California-Santa Cruz Astronomy and Astrophysics 8-26 4-14
5-17 University of Washington-Seattle Campus Astronomy 8-24 4-13
8-23 Ohio State University-Main Campus Astronomy 9-28 6-21
7-26 Columbia University in the City of New York Astronomy 10-28 6-23
7-25 Cornell University Astronomy and Space Sciences 6-23 10-31
6-28 The University of Texas at Austin Astronomy 1-28 14-32
8-26 University of Colorado at Boulder Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences


WHOA! Look at where Penn State is! Abhay Ashtekar is the Loop Quantum Cosmology kingpin in the USA. Go Abhay! Go PSU! Yay non-singular "bounce" cosmology!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
800 on quantitative section of GRE is essentially a necessity, huh (for math and physics)

i think that if that many people are getting 800's, they should make the test harder :biggrin:
 
I don't understand this thread: you ranked the astronomy and astrophysics departments in the US and are happy that Penn State comes out fifth, and then attribute it to the loop quantum cosmology research? You realize that the lqc research is not in the astronomy department, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 119 ·
4
Replies
119
Views
18K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K