Cutting a spring in half and then in 1/4 and 3/4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cutting Spring
Click For Summary
When a helical spring is cut in half, the spring constant for each half doubles, resulting in an effective stiffness of 2k for the two halves in series. For a spring cut into one-fourth and three-fourths, the spring constant for the one-fourth section becomes 4k, while the three-fourths section has a spring constant of 1.33k. The effective spring constant for the system is calculated using the formula for springs in series, leading to a total stiffness of 4k. The natural period of the system can then be determined based on this effective stiffness. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar spring-related problems.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A helical spring of stiffness k is cut into two halves and a mass m is connected to the two halves. The natural time period of this system is found to be 0.5 sec. If an identical spring is cut so that one part is one-fourth and the other part is three-fourths of the original length, and the mass m is connected to the two parts, what would be the natural period of the system?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Attached is the solution. Why is k2 = 4k? I understand the solution up until that point.

QVGb9pA.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh wait, I think I misunderstood the question.

F=kx => k =F/x and if we halve x we double k.

So basically if you take a spring, with some number N coils and stretch it by some length x, each winding or coil stretches by a factor of x/N. Now halve N (you're cutting the spring in half). Stretch the spring by the same length, each coil now stretches by a factor of 2x/N, effectively doubling the spring constant. (It takes 2x as much force to stretch or compress the spring by the same amount)
 
Dustinsfl said:
You link provides no useful information to the question I asked.
Yea, sorry about that.
 
Why did the textbookuse series of spring and not parallell springs Keq=k1+K2?
 
killercrew said:
Why did the textbookuse series of spring and not parallell springs Keq=k1+K2?
Not sure which step you are referring to.
The working has two stages. First, we need to find the effective k of each section of the cut spring. E.g. for the 1/4:3/4 split:
We can think of the uncut spring as these two sections in series:
##\frac 1k=\frac 1{k_{\frac 14}}+\frac 1{k_{\frac 34}}##.
Using the argument in post #4, we know that ##k_{\frac 14}=4k##. Substituting that leads to ##k_{\frac 34}=\frac 43k##.
In the second stage, we consider inserting the mass between the two sections. At the mass, for a given displacement, the two forces add. This is the same as for springs in parallel, so we use ##k_{net}=k_{\frac 14}+k_{\frac 34}##.
 
killercrew said:
Why did the textbookuse series of spring and not parallell springs Keq=k1+K2?

I have thought this until I recognized this:
The work is done on two steps for each case (taking the first case as an example):
- finding the new spring constant (k1) for each sector w.r.t the previous stiffness (k)... which make him use series leadind to (k1 = 2 k)
- finding the equivalent stiffness for the whole system (4k)... and then completing other steps
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K