Cyclotron Resonance: Lower Limit for Electron Scattering Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matt atkinson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclotron Resonance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the lower limit of electron scattering time necessary to observe cyclotron resonance in a material subjected to a magnetic field of 1 T. The effective mass of the electron is given as 0.06 times the free electron mass (m_o). The derived cyclotron frequency is calculated using the formula ω_c = eB / (0.06m_o), leading to a minimum scattering time τ_min = 2π / ω_c. The participant initially calculated τ_c as 2.14 ps, but the correct value is 0.54 ps, indicating a factor of 4 difference due to the consideration of electron scattering cycles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cyclotron resonance principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of electron effective mass
  • Knowledge of magnetic fields and their effects on charged particles
  • Proficiency in basic physics equations involving angular frequency and scattering time
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of cyclotron frequency in different materials
  • Explore the impact of effective mass on electron dynamics in magnetic fields
  • Investigate the relationship between scattering time and observation limits in cyclotron resonance
  • Learn about experimental techniques to measure electron scattering times
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying condensed matter physics, particularly those interested in the effects of magnetic fields on electron behavior and cyclotron resonance phenomena.

Matt atkinson
Messages
114
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Calculate the lower limit of the electron scattering time in a material placed in a magnetic field of 1 T which is necessary to observe cyclotron resonance. The electron effective mass in the material
is 0.06 ##m_o## (where ##m_o## is the free electron mass).

Homework Equations


##\omega_c=\frac{eB}{0.06m_o}##
##\tau_{min}=\frac{2\pi}{\omega_c}##

The Attempt at a Solution


So I basically substituted values into ##\omega_c## and then into the equation for ##\tau_c## i got ##\tau_c=2.14ps## whereas the answer says ##\tau_c=0.54ps##, have I gone wrong? or is the solution given wrong, because i have done it multiple times.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The two answers differ by a factor of 4 (+-2%). I guess they took 1/4 of a cycle to be sufficient (some electrons won't scatter for 4 times the scattering time). There is no absolute limit, a shorter time just makes observations harder.
 
ah okay! Thankyou very much I did notice the factor of 4 difference just wasn't sure where it came from.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K