1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: D Alembert's Principle: Dependence of kinetic energy on generalized coordinates.

  1. Jul 2, 2012 #1
    I was reading Goldestein's book on classical mechanics and I came across this (Page 20 3rd Edition):

    "Note that in a system of Cartesian coordinates the partial derivative of T with
    respect to qj vanishes. Thus, speaking in the language of differential geometry,
    this term arises from the curvature of the coordinates qj. In polar coordinates,
    e.g., it is in the partial derivative of T with respect to an angle coordinate that the
    centripetal acceleration teml appears."

    Here T=Kinetic energy of the system
    qj= the jth generalized coordinate.

    I don't exactly understand how this works.
    1.Why isn't it (dT/dq) zero in polar coordinates if it is zero in cartesian coordinates?
    2.What if velocity was a function of coordinates? dT/dq can't possibly be zero even in cartesian coordinates then right?

    I might have missed some assumption that makes everything clear, so all those of you who've read the book, please help!
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 4, 2012 #2
    I have the exact same question, no luck yet...
  4. Sep 4, 2012 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    I'm not sure why you'd expect ##\partial T/\partial q_i## to be zero in polar coordinates. The kinetic energy in polar coordinates is given by
    $$T=\frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2+ \frac{1}{2}mr^2\dot{\theta}^2.$$ Clearly, ##\partial T/\partial r = mr\dot{\theta}^2## is not zero in general. Goldstein should have said it was the partial derivative with respect to the radial coordinate that gives rise to the centripetal acceleration term.

    Regarding your second question, remember that the coordinates ##q_i## and velocities ##\dot{q_i}## are considered independent variables.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads for Alembert's Principle Dependence Date
Two particle in a square potential well? Dec 18, 2016
J/psi meson detection Dec 11, 2016
Using D' Alembert's Principle on an inverted cone. Jan 21, 2014