Damping effect in piezoelectric energy harvesting systems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison between two energy harvesting techniques using piezoelectric materials: the standard technique involving a rectifier bridge and filtering capacitance, and the nonlinear SSHI technique, which incorporates a switch and an inductor. The SSHI technique is noted for its efficiency in weak coupling scenarios but suffers from a damping effect in strong coupling situations, which does not occur with the standard technique. The damping effect arises from the active removal of energy, which dampens vibrations and affects the overall electromechanical conversion efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of piezoelectric materials and their applications in energy harvesting
  • Knowledge of electromechanical coupling factors and their significance
  • Familiarity with energy harvesting techniques, specifically rectifier bridges and filtering capacitance
  • Basic principles of nonlinear dynamics and vibration control
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the SSHI technique in detail, focusing on its design and operational principles
  • Study the effects of damping in piezoelectric systems and methods to mitigate it
  • Explore laboratory methods for creating weakly and strongly coupled piezoelectric structures
  • Investigate review articles on energy harvesting techniques and their comparative efficiencies
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and students involved in energy harvesting technologies, particularly those focused on piezoelectric systems and vibration control methodologies.

nabs16
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I have to make a report on an energy harvesting system using piezolectric materials by comparing two methods each other which are: the standard technique (rectifier bridge+filtering capacitance) and the nonlinear technique, by adding to the standard device a switch and an inductor in parallel of the piezoelectric element (SSHI technique) to optimize the electromechanical conversion.

According to the different articles, the nonlinear technique is very efficient in weak coupling (constant displacement amplitude) but not for larger electromechanical coupling factors due to a damping effect caused by the SSHI technique. What is concretly the damping effect ? why it doesn't occur using the standard technique ?

I know that the electromechanical coupling factor is low for weakly coupled structure and high for strongly coupled strucutre but i don't understand what it physically means. How can we obtain these two types of structures in laboratory ?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
nabs16 said:
Hi,

What is concretly the damping effect ? why it doesn't occur using the standard technique ?
All energy harvesting techniques remove energy from the system. The energy that is removed damps vibrations. More efficient energy removal causes more damping.

Another way to look at it is that energy harvesting is a form of active vibration control, where the energy removed is put to use instead of dissipated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nabs16, anorlunda and russ_watters
nabs16 said:
comparing two methods each other which are: the standard technique (rectifier bridge+filtering capacitance) and the nonlinear technique, by adding to the standard device a switch and an inductor in parallel of the piezoelectric element (SSHI technique) to optimize the electromechanical conversion.

According to the different articles, the nonlinear technique is very efficient in weak coupling (constant displacement amplitude) but not for larger electromechanical coupling factors due to a damping effect caused by the SSHI technique. What is concretly the damping effect ? why it doesn't occur using the standard technique ?
Can you post links to the reading you have been doing about this? That would be a big help. Thanks.
 
I found this: http://www.psma.com/sites/default/f...energy-harvesting-using-piezoelectric-dev.pdf showing what @berkeman asked about.

slask.png
 

Attachments

  • slask.png
    slask.png
    38 KB · Views: 673
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K