Damping effect in piezoelectric energy harvesting systems

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the damping effect in piezoelectric energy harvesting systems, specifically comparing the standard technique (rectifier bridge and filtering capacitance) with a nonlinear technique that incorporates a switch and an inductor in parallel with the piezoelectric element (SSHI technique). Participants explore the implications of these methods on electromechanical conversion efficiency, particularly under varying coupling conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the nature of the damping effect and its absence in the standard technique, suggesting that energy harvesting inherently dampens vibrations by removing energy from the system.
  • Another participant notes that more efficient energy removal leads to increased damping, framing energy harvesting as a form of active vibration control.
  • There is a request for sources related to the discussed techniques, indicating a desire for further reading on the topic.
  • Participants share links to articles, although some express concern about access due to paywalls and seek alternative review articles.
  • A later reply provides a link to a presentation that may address the switching architecture, which is of interest to one participant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express curiosity about the damping effect and its implications, but there is no consensus on the specifics of the damping effect or the comparative efficiency of the techniques discussed. Multiple viewpoints and requests for further information indicate that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying electromechanical coupling factors and their effects on energy harvesting efficiency, but the discussion lacks detailed definitions and explanations of these terms. There are also references to articles that may contain relevant information, but access limitations are noted.

nabs16
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I have to make a report on an energy harvesting system using piezolectric materials by comparing two methods each other which are: the standard technique (rectifier bridge+filtering capacitance) and the nonlinear technique, by adding to the standard device a switch and an inductor in parallel of the piezoelectric element (SSHI technique) to optimize the electromechanical conversion.

According to the different articles, the nonlinear technique is very efficient in weak coupling (constant displacement amplitude) but not for larger electromechanical coupling factors due to a damping effect caused by the SSHI technique. What is concretly the damping effect ? why it doesn't occur using the standard technique ?

I know that the electromechanical coupling factor is low for weakly coupled structure and high for strongly coupled strucutre but i don't understand what it physically means. How can we obtain these two types of structures in laboratory ?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
nabs16 said:
Hi,

What is concretly the damping effect ? why it doesn't occur using the standard technique ?
All energy harvesting techniques remove energy from the system. The energy that is removed damps vibrations. More efficient energy removal causes more damping.

Another way to look at it is that energy harvesting is a form of active vibration control, where the energy removed is put to use instead of dissipated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nabs16, anorlunda and russ_watters
nabs16 said:
comparing two methods each other which are: the standard technique (rectifier bridge+filtering capacitance) and the nonlinear technique, by adding to the standard device a switch and an inductor in parallel of the piezoelectric element (SSHI technique) to optimize the electromechanical conversion.

According to the different articles, the nonlinear technique is very efficient in weak coupling (constant displacement amplitude) but not for larger electromechanical coupling factors due to a damping effect caused by the SSHI technique. What is concretly the damping effect ? why it doesn't occur using the standard technique ?
Can you post links to the reading you have been doing about this? That would be a big help. Thanks.
 
I found this: http://www.psma.com/sites/default/f...energy-harvesting-using-piezoelectric-dev.pdf showing what @berkeman asked about.

slask.png
 

Attachments

  • slask.png
    slask.png
    38 KB · Views: 678
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K