B Data needed - Related bodies and their stats

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the search for data sets that provide information on the gravitational relationships between various astronomical bodies, including moons, planets, stars, black holes, galaxies, clusters, and superclusters. The original poster expresses frustration with the need to individually research and document these relationships. A participant humorously corrects a typo, emphasizing the importance of "astronomical" over "astrological." A suggestion is made to explore the Washington Visual Double Star Catalog, which contains over 140,000 entries, although it may not fully meet the original request. Overall, the thread highlights the challenge of finding comprehensive data on pairs of astronomical bodies and their statistics.
ForTheLoveOfPhysics
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Are there data sets for pairs of astronomical bodies and their stats? (Edited)
I’m analysing the gravitational relationships between different mass astronomical bodies and am getting sick of having to individually google and document these.

Are there data sets out there that list pairs/sets of objects which includes their mass and distance from each other?

Including; Moons, Planets, Stars, Black Holes, Galaxies, Clusters and Superclusters.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
ForTheLoveOfPhysics said:
TL;DR Summary: Are there data sets for pairs of astrological bodies and their stats?

I’m analysing the gravitational relationships between different mass astrological bodies and am getting sick of having to individually google and document these.
I'm really hoping you meant astronomical bodies.
Even so, there are a lot of astronomical bodies, so the likelihood of finding information about pairs of them is close to nil.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes ForTheLoveOfPhysics
Mark44 said:
I'm really hoping you meant astronomical bodies.
I sure did mean astronomical! My bad!
 
Mark44 said:
I'm really hoping you meant astronomical bodies.
Are astrological bodies weighed with Librae?
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes berkeman and ForTheLoveOfPhysics

Thread 'Population 3 star (Pop III) candidate LAP1'

"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
I How big are the non-mass parts of the stress-energy tensor?
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
B What fraction of the matter in the universe is in black holes?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
I New Paper Claims Primordial Black Holes Don't Explain Dark Matter
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Novel Geometrical Models of Relativistic Stars: A Physical Analysis
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Recent research relevant to quasar evolution
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Could Gravity Be More About Electromagnetic Forces Than We Think?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Programs Physics Minor - Course Selection for ME
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
I What Key Issues Should Cosmologists Address in the ΛCDM Model?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Starring Gravity, Co-Starring Magnetism
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K