David Hamel's Generator: Mythbusters Test & Miniature Homemade Version

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around David Hamel's generator, particularly its claims of perpetual motion and potential applications for generating electricity. Participants explore the feasibility of creating a miniature version and the underlying principles purportedly involved in its operation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions that the Hamel generator was featured on Mythbusters, noting its failure to demonstrate anti-gravity but suggesting it appeared to function as a generator.
  • Another participant questions whether connecting the Hamel generator to an electric generator could yield cheap and clean electricity, expressing skepticism about the practicality of such a claim.
  • A request for more information about the Hamel generator is made, indicating that some participants are unfamiliar with the device.
  • Information is provided about the "Magnetic Principle" associated with the generator, describing how it supposedly operates and its potential for long-term functionality if constructed correctly.
  • One participant categorically dismisses the concept as a crackpot idea, asserting that it cannot produce power or serve any useful purpose, and expresses concern about discussing such topics in the forum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some exploring the potential of the Hamel generator while others strongly reject its validity as a functional device. There is no consensus on the generator's feasibility or usefulness.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the generator's operation and longevity are based on speculative principles that lack empirical support. The discussion reflects a mix of curiosity and skepticism regarding the device's claims.

freedomto
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
David Hamel (1924-2007) made a generator, and some people might know it from mythbusters where they made one for the anti-gravity myth. Even though it didn't work for the anti-gravity the generator itself seemed to work. I then read on the internet that it is supposed to run for 100's of years.

I was interested in making one, does anyone know how to make a miniature homemade version?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I was thinking, this may be a stupid question, if the hamel generator was connected to a electric generator couldn't it produce cheap and clean electricity? - Sounds to good to be true
 
You need to post more information about a Hamel Generator. I (and I am sure others) have never heard of the device.
 
Okay, thanks for reply
This info is from JLN Labs [crackpot link deleted]

The picture in the attachtments is from the site and shows a version of the generator... not completely sure if this is hamel's design... but i think its the sames as in mythbusters

This device use the "Magnetic Principle" :

The "Magnetic Principle" : It uses same principle as the "Hamel Spinner". The destabilizing magnet on top is the "Hamel Spinner" and the first Cone that wobbles would equate to the smaller disc magnet and ball bearing. The Spinner wants to move in a circular path under the larger destabilizing magnet. That is in part why the cones Wobble. The cones want to seek equilibrium, but can only find it in a dymanic way !

This "Magnetic principle" device will, if built right, run for many thousands of years !
 

Attachments

  • h45banm.gif
    h45banm.gif
    86.1 KB · Views: 963
Last edited by a moderator:
This is a crackpot perpetual motion machine. No, it won't produce power. It won't do anything useful at all.

As a rule, we don't discuss such things here - it brings crackpots out of the woodwook and provides free advertising for the originator of the crackpot idea.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K