DC voltages, someone shoot me down please

  • Thread starter Thread starter ajd-brown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dc
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and principles behind doubling DC voltage from 3V to 6V using a capacitor-based circuit. Participants explore the mechanics of voltage doubling, power considerations, and the implications of charge and current in such circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Anthony proposes a circuit design that charges in parallel and discharges in series to double the voltage from 3V to 6V, seeking validation or critique.
  • Some participants identify the circuit as a standard flying capacitor-based voltage doubler, noting that while it can double voltage, it does not provide power gain.
  • There is a discussion about why power does not increase with voltage doubling, with references to the second law of thermodynamics and the need for active devices to achieve power gain.
  • One participant explains that a capacitor can only release as much charge as it has stored, emphasizing the relationship between current, charge, and time.
  • Another participant attempts to illustrate the concept of power by discussing the relationship between charge transfer time and current, leading to confusion about power definitions.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the definitions of power and current, with emphasis on the exponential nature of discharging current and voltage in capacitors.
  • There is a reiteration that while voltage can be increased, the available current decreases, maintaining the same power output.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principles of voltage doubling and power conservation, but there is some confusion and debate regarding the implications of current and charge transfer in relation to power output.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions of power and current, and there are unresolved questions about the energy losses in resistive components during capacitor charging and discharging.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in electrical engineering, circuit design, or those studying the principles of voltage and power in capacitive systems may find this discussion relevant.

ajd-brown
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am trying to double DC voltage from 3v to 6v

apparently this circuit works...

charge in parallel discharge in series,

can somebody shoot me down and tell it won't work please?

Thanks

Anthony
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    13.8 KB · Views: 493
Engineering news on Phys.org
Also, I know the resistors are ridiculously small, I just wanted to charge the capacitor quickly...
 
Looks like a pretty standard flying capacitor based voltage doubler. It works but you don't have any power gain so while your voltage is doubled your ability to drive anything with that higher voltage is reduced.

Also beware of charge sharing with whatever you connect the higher voltage to.
 
well that's a relief, but why does it not give more power? i thought the capacitors could release much higher currents than batteries, so if the voltage has increased, and the current is higher, surely power will increase :(
 
It doesn't give more power because if it did it would be a perpetual motion machine and violate the second law of thermodynamics. To get more power you need an active device in there somewhere.

People use circuits like you made sometimes in practice. For example, in a Flash memory typically the high voltage drive used to write a bit is generated using a switched-capacitor voltage doubler similar to what you showed.

Also, a capacitor stores charge. It can only release as much charge as it has stored on it. Remember current is nothing more than charge/time.
 
if the battery transfers 50 coulombs of energy to a capacitor and it takes 100 seconds to do so because the current supplied from the battery is low, say 0.5A, the charge = 100 x 0.5 A = 50 Coulombs, then if this charge is released in 10 seconds instead, the current flow will be 5A... and the voltage will remain 12v (for the most part)... therefore, same charge transferred in less time = more power?
 
Nice try! You came *this* close to inventing a perpetual motion machine! ;-)

Power isn't charge/time, that's current. Power is voltage*current.

When you charge a cap with a constant current the voltage will increase linearly since the voltage across a cap is proportional to the integral of I.

In your argument, you are assuming the discharging current is constant as well. However, when you release it, the voltage is now a decaying exponential with a time constant of RC (where R is the discharging resistance). Because cap current is proportional to dV/dt, the current is also an exponential. The following link explains it pretty well:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/capdis.html#c2

You're thinking well! You'll get it! :)
 
to put it more simply...

you initially have 3V at let's say 2Amps ... that 6Watts
if you double the voltage you will halve the current available
so now you have 6V @ 1 Amp still = 6W
you cannot generate power ( energy ) out of thin air ;)

Dave
 
ajd-brown said:
if the battery transfers 50 coulombs of energy to a capacitor and it takes 100 seconds to do so because the current supplied from the battery is low, say 0.5A, the charge = 100 x 0.5 A = 50 Coulombs, then if this charge is released in 10 seconds instead, the current flow will be 5A... and the voltage will remain 12v (for the most part)... therefore, same charge transferred in less time = more power?

Yes, exactly. You get more power but for a shorter amount of time. And since energy = power * time. The energy stays the same.
Well, actually the energy is lower. The energy in a capacitor is 1/2 * charge * voltage. When charging a capacitor through a resistor half the energy gets lost in the resistance.

What carlgrace meant is the average power you get when opening and closing those switches repeatedly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K