De Sitter Vacuum: Is it the Only Positive CC Solution?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wabbit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Positive Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of spacetimes with zero Weyl curvature and an Einstein tensor proportional to the metric. Participants explore whether such spacetimes must be isometric to a de Sitter vacuum or if other solutions exist, along with how these solutions might be classified.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if spacetimes with zero Weyl curvature and an Einstein tensor proportional to the metric must be isometric to a de Sitter vacuum or if other solutions exist.
  • Another participant states that the Einstein tensor proportional to the metric implies constant scalar curvature and that vanishing Weyl curvature indicates maximally symmetric spaces, which are of constant sectional curvature.
  • It is proposed that such spaces can be conformally rescaled to model constant curvature spaces, specifically noting that for a positive cosmological constant, this corresponds to de Sitter space.
  • Concerns are raised about the distinction between isometric and conformally equivalent metrics, with a request for clarification on conformal transformations.
  • Further elaboration is provided on the relationship between sectional curvature and conformal rescaling, suggesting that a stronger condition than initially assumed may be required for genuine isometry.
  • References are suggested for further reading on the topic, including a specific mention of "Besse, Einstein Manifolds" as a potential resource.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of conformal rescaling and whether it leads to isometric solutions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the classification of spacetimes under the given conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the situation and the potential for additional questions arising from the discussion of conformal transformations and their implications for sectional curvature.

wabbit
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,284
Reaction score
208
Assuming a spacetime with zero Weyl curvature and an Einstein tensor proportional to the metric, is it true that in a finite neighborhood of any point, that spacetime must be isometric to a de Sitter vacuum, or are there other possible solutions, and if so how are they classified?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Einstein tensor proportional to the metric implies constant scalar curvature. Then vanishing of the Weyl curvature implies that the space is maximally symmetric ##R_{mnpq} = k ( g_{mp}g_{nq} - g_{mq}g_{np})## and therefore of constant sectional curvature. Therefore such a space is, by a conformal rescaling of the metric, equivalent to one of the model constant curvature spaces. For signature ##(1,d-1)## and positive cosmological constant, this is indeed de Sitter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wabbit
Thanks - you say "by a conformal rescaling", so it isn't isometric, only conformally equivalent ? I must say conformal transformations isn't something I am really familiar with.

Would you have a source to suggest where I could read more about this ?
 
wabbit said:
Thanks - you say "by a conformal rescaling", so it isn't isometric, only conformally equivalent ? I must say conformal transformations isn't something I am really familiar with.

The issue is that the denominator of the formula for sectional curvature involves precisely the same contractions that correspond to the Riemann tensor of a maximally symmetric manifold. So we can rescale ##g' = e^{2\sigma(x)} g## without changing the sectional curvature. With this relation we say that ##g'## is pointwise conformal to ##g##. If there is a diffeomorphism that pulls ##g'## back to ##g##, then we say that the metrics are conformally equivalent and there is a genuine isometry. I think this is a stronger condition than the assumptions warrant.

Would you have a source to suggest where I could read more about this ?

It is probably overkill and yet might not even answer all questions that you might have, but the most specific reference I know of is Besse, Einstein Manifolds. Some results are discussed in the first few pages of this lecture.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wabbit
Ah, the situation seems more complex than I thought - will check these, thanks for the references.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K