Decay formula with Improper Integrals

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
lelandsthename
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey everyone! I have another question about improper integrals, they're so hard!

M = -k [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\stackrel{inf.}{0}[/tex] te^(kt) dt

When k = -0.000121 (Carbon 14's constant, we are solving for the mean life of a carbon-14 isotope)


Homework Equations


Improper integrals, integration by parts


The Attempt at a Solution



=- k lim[tex]_{t->inf.}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex]te^(kt) dt from 0 to infinity

by parts:
u = t
du = dt
dv = e^(k) dt
v = (1/k)e^(-kt)

=(t((1/k)e^(kt)) + [tex]\int[/tex](1/k)e^(kt)dt

=((t)/(k))e^(-0.000121t) - (1/((k)^2)e^(kt)

=- k lim[tex]_{t->inf.}[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex](t)/(k)e^(kt) - (1/(k)^2)e^(kt)

Where can I go from here? I can put both terms over (k)^2 but the limit of that term times e^(k) equals 1*, right? So is hte answer just -k? Somehow I am skeptical!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi lelandsthename! :smile:

oooh … you've made this so complicated! :cry:

why not just leave k as k until the very end?
lelandsthename said:
… I can put both terms over (0.000121)^2 but the limit of that term times e^(-0.000121t) equals 0, right?

Nooo … e-∞ = 0, but e0 = 1. :smile:
 
haha! ok I will give it a try with k first, it'll even make it look neater! :smile: and thank you for helping me with the limit! So because the limit equals one then the answer will just be -k?