Decay formula with Improper Integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving an improper integral related to the decay formula of Carbon-14, specifically using the constant k = -0.000121. Participants explore the integration by parts method to evaluate the integral M = -k ∫ from 0 to ∞ te^(kt) dt. The conversation highlights the importance of handling limits correctly, particularly as t approaches infinity, and confirms that the limit of the exponential term approaches zero, simplifying the final answer to -k.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals
  • Familiarity with integration by parts
  • Knowledge of exponential decay functions
  • Basic calculus concepts, including limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of improper integrals in calculus
  • Practice integration by parts with various functions
  • Learn about exponential decay and its applications in real-world scenarios
  • Explore advanced limit techniques in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on improper integrals and exponential decay, as well as educators looking for examples of integration techniques in action.

lelandsthename
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey everyone! I have another question about improper integrals, they're so hard!

M = -k \int\stackrel{inf.}{0} te^(kt) dt

When k = -0.000121 (Carbon 14's constant, we are solving for the mean life of a carbon-14 isotope)


Homework Equations


Improper integrals, integration by parts


The Attempt at a Solution



=- k lim_{t->inf.} \intte^(kt) dt from 0 to infinity

by parts:
u = t
du = dt
dv = e^(k) dt
v = (1/k)e^(-kt)

=(t((1/k)e^(kt)) + \int(1/k)e^(kt)dt

=((t)/(k))e^(-0.000121t) - (1/((k)^2)e^(kt)

=- k lim_{t->inf.} \int(t)/(k)e^(kt) - (1/(k)^2)e^(kt)

Where can I go from here? I can put both terms over (k)^2 but the limit of that term times e^(k) equals 1*, right? So is hte answer just -k? Somehow I am skeptical!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi lelandsthename! :smile:

oooh … you've made this so complicated! :cry:

why not just leave k as k until the very end?
lelandsthename said:
… I can put both terms over (0.000121)^2 but the limit of that term times e^(-0.000121t) equals 0, right?

Nooo … e-∞ = 0, but e0 = 1. :smile:
 
haha! ok I will give it a try with k first, it'll even make it look neater! :smile: and thank you for helping me with the limit! So because the limit equals one then the answer will just be -k?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K