Deceleration parameter and critical densities

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 5K views
dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using Friedmann equations find the parameter of deceleration [itex]q_0[/itex] using relative densities [itex]\Omega_M,\ \Omega_R,\ \Omega_\Lambda[/itex].

Homework Equations



Friedmann equations, deceleration parameter:

[itex]q_0=-\frac{\ddot{a_0}a_0}{\dot{a_0}^2}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



So from second Friedmann equation (the one with k parameter which tells us whether the Universe is open, flat or close) and got to this point:

[tex]\left(\frac{\dot{a}}{\dot{a_0}}\right)^2 = \left(\frac{a_0}{a}\right)^2\Omega_R+\left(\frac{a_0}{a}\right)\Omega_M+\Omega_K+\left(\frac{a}{a_0}\right)^2\Omega_\Lambda[/tex]

a is the scale factor (sometimes denoted as R in the books).

And I'm stuck. The book here

equation (11.55)

Says that I should get

[itex]q=\frac{\Omega_M}{2}+\Omega_R-\Omega_\Lambda[/itex]

I tried using first Friedmann equation, but then my equation depends on parameter w, which connects pressure and density: [itex]p=w\rho[/itex], and I don't get correct answer :\

I found one presentation which says that I should somehow (no explanation, of course -.-") connect the equation I got with the deceleration parameter using: "a bit of math".

I tried connecting the second derivative of the scale factor in the definition of deceleration parameter, so that I don't need to use the equation which has w in it, but I really have no idea what to do.

Any help would be appreciated...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean I should differentiate the expression with omegas? But that would give me really complicated expression on the right, wouldn't it?

[itex]\frac{2 \dot{a}<br /> \ddot{a}}{\dot{a_0}^2}-\frac<br /> {2 \dot{a}^2<br /> \ddot{a_0}}{\dot{a_0}^3}[/itex]

Hmmm...

If the a_0 is scale factor at the present time, than it's constant, no? That means that it doesn't depend on time, and I just derive the numerator, right? And if, after that I put that I am looking at t=t_0 than I get deceleration parameter.

Am I going in the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Oh that simplifies things :D Thanks, I dk why I thought it depended on time :\
 
So when I do the derivation and when I simplify things a bit, I need to presume that I'm looking at the t=t_0, so that my scale factors would all cancel out, right?
 
dingo_d said:
So when I do the derivation and when I simplify things a bit, I need to presume that I'm looking at the t=t_0, so that my scale factors would all cancel out, right?

Yes.
 
I got the correct answer :) Thanks for all the help ^^ thumbs up :D