Decide whether or not U is a subspace of V

  • Thread starter Thread starter AkilMAI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining whether specific subsets U of vector spaces V are subspaces. Three cases are analyzed: (i) U in R^4 defined by the equation 3x1 - x2 - 2x3 + x4 = 0 is confirmed as a subspace, with the basis derivable from the equation. (ii) U in R^3 defined by x1^2 = x2^2 + 4x3^2 is not a subspace, as it fails closure under addition. (iii) U in P3 defined by p'(0) = p(1) is also not a subspace, as shown through counterexamples. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of verifying closure properties for subspace determination.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces
  • Familiarity with linear combinations and closure properties
  • Knowledge of polynomial functions and their derivatives
  • Ability to manipulate and analyze equations in R^n
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the criteria for subspaces in vector spaces
  • Learn how to derive bases from linear equations in R^n
  • Explore closure properties of polynomial functions in P3
  • Investigate counterexamples to subspace definitions in various vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians analyzing vector spaces, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of subspace criteria and properties.

AkilMAI
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For each of the following subsets U of the vector space V I have to decide whether or not U is a subspace of V . In each case when U is a subspace, I also must find a
basis for U and state dim U:
(i) V = R^4; U = {x = (x1; x2; x3; x4) : 3x1 - x2 -2x3 + x4 = 0}:
(ii) V = R^3; U = {x = (x1; x2; x3) : x1^2 = x2^2 + 4*x3^2}
(iii) V = P3; U = {p in P3 : p'(0) = p(1)}
I have some questions for each problem...

Homework Equations



...

The Attempt at a Solution


I need to know that my solutions are ok or not and if so, how to find the basis and dim of U.
(i) we take x,y in U=> x+y=0 and a(a scalar),a*x=a*0=0 ,so it is closed under addition and scalar multiplication,therefore it is a subspace.If my approach is correct how can I find basis U and dim U?
(ii)Here I did something similair,I wrote x1^2 = x2^2 + 4*x3^2 as x1^2 - x2^2 - 4*x3^2=0
=> x,y in U where x+y =0+0=0 and a*x=a*0=0.Again If my approach is correct how cand I find basis U and dim U?
(iii)take p and g two polyn from U=>(g+p)(1)=p(1)+g(1)=p'(0)+g'(0)=(g+p)(0) and (a*p)(1)=a*p(1)=a*p(0)=(a*p)(0).Same thing, If my approach is correct how cand I find basis U and dim U?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


AkilMAI said:

Homework Statement


For each of the following subsets U of the vector space V I have to decide whether or not U is a subspace of V . In each case when U is a subspace, I also must find a
basis for U and state dim U:
(i) V = R^4; U = {x = (x1; x2; x3; x4) : 3x1 - x2 -2x3 + x4 = 0}:
(ii) V = R^3; U = {x = (x1; x2; x3) : x1^2 = x2^2 + 4*x3^2}
(iii) V = P3; U = {p in P3 : p'(0) = p(1)}
I have some questions for each problem...

Homework Equations



...

The Attempt at a Solution


I need to know that my solutions are ok or not and if so, how to find the basis and dim of U.
(i) we take x,y in U=> x+y=0 and a(a scalar),a*x=a*0=0 ,so it is closed under addition and scalar multiplication,therefore it is a subspace.If my approach is correct how can I find basis U and dim U?

What do you mean by "x+ y= 0" and "a*x= a*0= 0"? If x and y are arbitrary members of U, they they are NOT necessarily the 0 vector and neither x+ y nor a*x is the 0 vector. You need to use the definition of U: that if x= (x1, x2, x3, x4) then 3x1- x2- 2x3+x4= 0 and you have made no reference to that equation.

As for a basis, any vector in the set is of the form (x1, x2, x3, x4) but you can use the single equation, 3x1- x2- 2x3+x4= 0, to write one of those in terms of the other three. replace that one, in (x1, x2, x3, x4), by its expression as the other three, and then write it as a linear combination specific vectors with the x1, x2, etc. as coefficients.

(ii)Here I did something similar,I wrote x1^2 = x2^2 + 4*x3^2 as x1^2 - x2^2 - 4*x3^2=0
=> x,y in U where x+y =0+0=0 and a*x=a*0=0.Again If my approach is correct how cand I find basis U and dim U?
No, your approach is NOT correct. Saying that x= (x1, x2, x3) such that x1^2 = x2^2 + 4*x3^2 does NOT mean that x= 0!

(iii)take p and g two polyn from U=>(g+p)(1)=p(1)+g(1)=p'(0)+g'(0)=(g+p)(0) and (a*p)(1)=a*p(1)=a*p(0)=(a*p)(0).Same thing, If my approach is correct how cand I find basis U and dim U?
Again, all you have done in all three is state the conditions for a subspace- that it be closed under addition and scalar multiplication. You have NOT shown that this is true for these particular subsets. In fact, that is NOT true for at least one of these sets. For ii and iii, see my suggestions for i.

I won't do your problems for you but I will give other examples:

Show that (x1, x2, x3), such that 2x1- x2+ 3x3= 0 is a subspace of R^3.

If x and y are vectors in this subspace, then we can write x= (x1, x2, x3) with 2x1- x2+ 3x3= 0 and we can write y= (y1, y2, y3) with 2y1- y2+ 3y3= 0. Are x+y= (x1+ y1, x2+ y2, x3+ y3) and ax= (ax1, ax2, ax3) also in that set? That is, do they satisfy that defining equation?

2(x1+ y1)- (x2+ y2)+ 3(x3+ y3)= 2x1+ 2y1- x2- y2+ 3x3+ 3y3= (2x1- x2+ 3x3)+ (2y1- y2+ 3y3)= 0+ 0= 0.

2(ax1)- (ax2)+ 3(ax3)= a(2x1- x2+ 3x3)= a(0)= 0 so, yes, they do. This is a subspace of R^3.

We can solve 2x1- x2+ 3x3= 0 for x2: x2= 2x1+ 3x3. That means we can write an arbitrary member of the subspace as x= (x1, x2, x3)= (x1, 2x1+3x3, x3)= (x1, 2x1, 0)+ (0, 3x3, x3)= x1(1, 2, 0)+ x3(0, 3, 1). Now can you see a basis and the dimension?

Another example. Let U be the set of all vetors (x1, x2) in R^2 such that x1^2- x2^2= 0. Is this a subspace? Let x= (x1, x2) and y= (y1, y2) be in this set. Then x+y= (x1+y1, x2+ y2). Is this in the same set? Does it satisfy (x1+ y1)^2- (x2+ y2)^2= 0?

(x1+ y1)^2- (x2+ y2)^2= (x1^2+ 2x1y1+ y1^2)- (x2^2+ 2x2y2+ y2^2)= (x1^2- x2^2)+ (y1^2- y2^2)+ (2x1y1- 2x2y2)= (0)+ (0)+ 2(x1y1- x2y2). That is equal to 0 if and only if x1y1= x2y2 but that is NOT always true. In order to show that it is NOT always true we only need to find a counter-example.

Look at x=(1, 1) and y= (1, -1) (so that x1y1= 1(1)= 1 and x2y2= (1)(-1)= -1 are NOT equal). Both are in the set because (1)^2- (1)^2= 0 and (1)^2- (-1)^2= 0. But x+ y= (1+ 1, 1- 1)= (1, 0). Now (1)^2- 0^2= 1, not 0, so these are two vectors in the subset whose sum is NOT in the subset. This subset is not closed under addition so the subset is NOT a subspace.

Since this is not a subspace, there is NO basis and NO dimension.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K