Deciding between Physics or Engineering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for a prospective university student choosing between a career in physics or engineering. Participants explore the implications of each path, including job market considerations, educational trajectories, and personal interests in specific fields such as particle physics and mechanical engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a strong interest in particle physics and astrophysics but is concerned about the job market and the difficulty of finding stable positions in these fields.
  • Another participant suggests pursuing a BA in engineering followed by a master's in physics as a way to gain diverse skills and perspectives.
  • Concerns are raised about the low probability of securing tenured positions in academia for those who complete a PhD in astrophysics or particle physics, with estimates suggesting a 1 in 10 chance.
  • It is noted that while physics graduates may face challenges in finding research positions, they generally report good salaries and job satisfaction when entering the workforce.
  • Engineering is characterized as a professional degree with a clearer pathway to employment, contrasting with the academic nature of a physics degree.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of personal motivation and effort in determining job prospects in either field.
  • There is mention of the potential for a double major or minor in physics, though this is acknowledged to involve significant workload.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the job security and satisfaction associated with degrees in physics versus engineering. There is no consensus on the best path, as opinions vary regarding the value of each degree and the likelihood of finding employment in desired fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the uncertainty surrounding job markets for physics graduates, the competitive nature of academic positions, and the varying experiences of individuals based on their educational choices and personal circumstances.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective university students considering careers in physics or engineering, as well as individuals interested in the job market dynamics of STEM fields.

smartdude00111
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to decide if I should pursue a career in physics in physics or engineering. I'm 17 and will be applying to universities soon and I'm considering the University of Waterloo, Queen's University and University of Toronto. If I continue with engineering than I would most likely pursue mechanical or mechatronics.

I really have a passion for particle physics and astrophysics and am wishing to achieve a masters and PhD but I'm aware that there seems to be limited job market for these professions. I've done some research and there are a lot of different answers as to how hard it is to find a job, some say it is relatively easy but others say that the market for these jobs will only diminish.I do not plan on having a large family and so money is not such a big concern but I would like a living wage, such as 65,000k. I would like to know how difficult it is and how long it takes to find a stable position in a pure field of physics. Also are the job prospects any different between theoretical and experimental physics.

It seems like there are greater job opportunities for mechanical or mechatronical engineers, so if I pursue an education in one of these fields than it would be for the job security, I would enjoy a career in these fields and so I would not be miserable but I feel like I would enjoy physics more.

I've also considered doing a double major, or minoring in physics, but I understand that this would entail a lot of work and am not completely sure about how that would work.

I'm just looking for some statistics and advice because I'll be applying to programs shortly and am a little stressed. It's a big decision and any input will be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could also consider to make a BA in engineering to learn how engineers think and then a master in physics to learn how to think :-)
Seriously speaking, I hardly know of any theoretical physicist working as such after his PhD, even less in particle physics.
When talking about family take in mind that these decisions depend also largely on your partner which you may not have found yet.
On the other hand time at university will probably be the only time in your live until retirement when you will be free to pursue your own interests.
 
DrDu said:
You could also consider to make a BA in engineering to learn how engineers think and then a master in physics to learn how to think :-)

I would certainly agree that there is a difference, but it is not the difference that this comment implies.

As to which degree you should pursue, I think much depends on how good you expect to be at what you do. If you are willing to work hard enough to be at the top of whatever you choose, you will find employment there. If, on the other hand, you do not envision working that hard and want to be more assured of a job, you need to look hard at where the jobs are more abundant.
 
In making this decision it's important to remember that what you're deciding on is the direction of your post--secondary education and not necessarily your career (although the two are often correlated).

Physics is an academic degree. In general a physics degree is oriented towards preparing students for graduate studies in physics. The majority of people who study physics do not go on to become professors, unfortunately. It's hard to give precise statistics on those who do. If you finish a PhD in astrophysics or particle physics, it's best to assume you've got about a 1 in 10 chance of getting a tenured position and that you'll be competing against many highly motivated, extremely intelligent and hard-working people for it. That said, the data indicates that physics graduates tend to do quite well in terms of salaries and job satisfaction when they do enter the workforce, and there is low unemployment associated with the degree. One of the bigger issues is that they aren't usually doing the physics research that they wanted to do originally. The other is that the transition from academia to the workforce can be difficult. A lot can depend on the skills that you pick up during your education.

Engineering on the other hand is a professional degree. Most engineering programs are set up specifically to allow you to enter the workforce as an engineer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr. Courtney and StatGuy2000

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K