Graduate Decomposition into irreps of compact Lie group

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orodruin
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on decomposing representations of compact Lie groups, specifically using character inner products to find the multiplicity of irreducible representations. The character inner product for finite groups is expressed through a sum over conjugacy classes, which generalizes to compact Lie groups using an integral involving the Haar measure. The user seeks to apply this to the group SO(3), looking for a function that relates the character inner product to the rotation angle parameterized by theta. They identify a potential issue with using the sine function in their calculations, realizing that the correct mapping from SU(2) to SO(3) involves using sin²(θ/2) instead of sin²(θ). This adjustment leads to the expected results for the representations being analyzed.
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
22,820
Reaction score
14,875
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product
$$
\langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$
where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be rewritten as
$$
\langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{C \in [G]} n(C) \chi(C) \chi_0(C)^*,
$$
where ##[G]## is the set of conjugacy classes of ##G## and ##n(C)## is the number of elements in ##C##.

This should generalise to compact Lie groups with the character inner product given by
$$
\langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{V_G} \int_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^* d\mu_G
$$
where ##V_G = \int_{g\in G}d\mu_G## and ##d\mu_G## is the Haar measure on ##G##. The corresponding expression on the conjugacy class level should be
$$
\langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{V_G} \int_{C\in [G]} \chi(C) \chi_0(C)^* d\mu_{[G]}
$$
with ##d\mu_{[G]}## being a measure on the conjugacy classes determined by integrating the Haar measure over each conjugacy class. Right?

My particular problem is doing this for ##SO(3)##. More explicitly, the conjugacy classes of ##SO(3)## should be parametrised by the rotation angle ##\theta## (with the conjugate elements being rotations around different axis by the same ##\theta##). I am especially looking for the function ##f(\theta)## such that
$$
\langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{V_G} \int_{0}^\pi \chi(\theta) \chi_0(\theta)^* f(\theta) d\theta.$$

Any insights?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fresh_42 said:
I have found the formula
$$
\int_{\operatorname{SU}(2)}f(\theta)\,d\theta = \dfrac{2}{\pi}\int_0^\pi (f\circ e)(t)\sin^2(t)\,dt
$$
including a proof, but in German. Maybe it helps anyway.

Source: https://wwwold.mathematik.tu-dortmund.de/~lschwach/SS10/Bachelor-Seminar/Averim.pdf
I think I found my issue. I was trying ##\sin^2(\theta)##, but when mapping from SU(2) to SO(3), the ##t## here is actually ##\theta/2##?

Using ##\sin^2(\theta)## I obtained that the fundamental representation should contain the trivial one once, which would be absurd. Using ##\sin^2(\theta/2)## gives zero as expected.

It also gives the correct result (2) for the representation ##\operatorname{Sym}^2(\operatorname{Sym}^2 V)## (with ##V## being the fundamental representation), which is what I was really looking for.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K