MHB Decrease in Potential Energy of a Sliding Tile

AI Thread Summary
A tile with a mass of 1.2 kg slides 3 meters down a roof at a 35-degree angle, resulting in a decrease in potential energy. The correct calculation for potential energy is PE = mgh, where g is approximated as 10 m/s², leading to a value of 20.6 J. The initial calculation of 24.8 J was incorrect due to an error in the height used in the formula. The discussion highlights confusion over using g = 10 m/s² instead of the more precise 9.8 m/s². Accurate calculations are crucial for determining potential energy in physics problems.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A tile of mass 1.2 kg slides 3m down a roof that makes an angle of 35 degree to the horizontal. Find the decrease in potential energy.
Iam getting the ans 24.8J
PE = mgh= 1.2× 12 sin 35 ×3
The ans in the textbook is 20.6J
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea but something went wrong.

Your mistake: PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)). Where did you get the 12 from?

PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)) = 20.6 J.

(You have to use a Scientific calculator anyway, so I don't understand why you would be told to use g = 10 m/s^2 instead of 9.8 m/s^2. I think it's silly!)

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
You have the right idea but something went wrong.

Your mistake: PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)). Where did you get the 12 from?

PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)) = 20.6 J.

(You have to use a Scientific calculator anyway, so I don't understand why you would be told to use g = 10 m/s^2 instead of 9.8 m/s^2. I think it's silly!)

-Dan
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
871
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top