MHB Decrease in Potential Energy of a Sliding Tile

Click For Summary
A tile with a mass of 1.2 kg slides 3 meters down a roof at a 35-degree angle, resulting in a decrease in potential energy. The correct calculation for potential energy is PE = mgh, where g is approximated as 10 m/s², leading to a value of 20.6 J. The initial calculation of 24.8 J was incorrect due to an error in the height used in the formula. The discussion highlights confusion over using g = 10 m/s² instead of the more precise 9.8 m/s². Accurate calculations are crucial for determining potential energy in physics problems.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A tile of mass 1.2 kg slides 3m down a roof that makes an angle of 35 degree to the horizontal. Find the decrease in potential energy.
Iam getting the ans 24.8J
PE = mgh= 1.2× 12 sin 35 ×3
The ans in the textbook is 20.6J
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea but something went wrong.

Your mistake: PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)). Where did you get the 12 from?

PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)) = 20.6 J.

(You have to use a Scientific calculator anyway, so I don't understand why you would be told to use g = 10 m/s^2 instead of 9.8 m/s^2. I think it's silly!)

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
You have the right idea but something went wrong.

Your mistake: PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)). Where did you get the 12 from?

PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)) = 20.6 J.

(You have to use a Scientific calculator anyway, so I don't understand why you would be told to use g = 10 m/s^2 instead of 9.8 m/s^2. I think it's silly!)

-Dan
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
888
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K