Deep Inelastic Scattering

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nasa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inelastic
Nasa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Consider deep inelastic scattering, where a high energy electron collides with a proton. The initial momentum of the electron is ##k^{\mu}## , the final state momentum is ##k'^{\mu}## , and the scattering angle is ##\theta##.
(1) Show that the transfer momentum ##q(=k-k')## is spatial in the limit where the electron mass is ignored.
(2) Find the scattering angle at which the electron mass cannot be ignored.
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{d^2\sigma}{d\Omega dE} $$

$$= \frac{\alpha^2}{4E^2}\frac{X}{\cos^2} \frac{\theta}{2}\sin^4$$

$$\frac{\theta}{2}(\frac{1}{\nu} F_2(x,Q)+\frac{2}{M}F_1(x,Q) \tan^2 \frac{\theta}{2})$$

where ##Q^2=-q^2,\quad x=\frac{Q^2}{2p\cdot q}##
To make ##q^0## 0, we just need to boost it so that ##|\boldsymbol{k}^{2}=|\boldsymbol{k}′|## ~.

$$q^0=k−k′=\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}^2}−\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}′^2}$$

But this is possible regardless of the approximation $m_e\to0$. What does it mean when it says that ##q^0## becomes 0 by approximating the electron mass to 0?

Also this is possible for any scattering angle $\theta$, but since it says that the mass cannot be ignored depending on the scattering angle ##\theta##, I assume that it is fixed to a Fixed Target frame and boosting is not taken into account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
 
Orodruin said:
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
So "spatial" means spacelike (##q^2<0##). Now I have solved problem 1! Thank you.
 
Hi Nasa,

I tried to fix your latex, which, I think, had an added close brace that caused other expressions to not render correctly.

Maybe you can look at your post and fix it the way you want

Also, notice the {X} I added because it seemed your \frac was missing a denominator.

Jedi
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top