Deep Inelastic Scattering

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nasa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inelastic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) analysis reveals that to achieve a four-momentum transfer of ##q^0 = 0##, one must boost the momentum such that the magnitudes of the incoming and outgoing momenta are equal, specifically ##|\boldsymbol{k}^{2}| = |\boldsymbol{k}'|##. The approximation of the electron mass to zero is valid and affects the interpretation of scattering angles. The discussion clarifies that spacelike conditions are characterized by ##q^2 < 0##, not necessarily implying ##q^0 = 0##. Additionally, the importance of correcting LaTeX formatting in scientific discussions is highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-momentum in particle physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of spacelike and timelike intervals
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for scientific notation
  • Basic principles of Deep Inelastic Scattering
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the massless limit in particle physics
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of four-momentum transfer in DIS
  • Explore the significance of scattering angles in high-energy physics
  • Review LaTeX best practices for scientific writing
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and researchers involved in high-energy experiments who seek to understand the nuances of Deep Inelastic Scattering and its mathematical representations.

Nasa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Consider deep inelastic scattering, where a high energy electron collides with a proton. The initial momentum of the electron is ##k^{\mu}## , the final state momentum is ##k'^{\mu}## , and the scattering angle is ##\theta##.
(1) Show that the transfer momentum ##q(=k-k')## is spatial in the limit where the electron mass is ignored.
(2) Find the scattering angle at which the electron mass cannot be ignored.
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{d^2\sigma}{d\Omega dE} $$

$$= \frac{\alpha^2}{4E^2}\frac{X}{\cos^2} \frac{\theta}{2}\sin^4$$

$$\frac{\theta}{2}(\frac{1}{\nu} F_2(x,Q)+\frac{2}{M}F_1(x,Q) \tan^2 \frac{\theta}{2})$$

where ##Q^2=-q^2,\quad x=\frac{Q^2}{2p\cdot q}##
To make ##q^0## 0, we just need to boost it so that ##|\boldsymbol{k}^{2}=|\boldsymbol{k}′|## ~.

$$q^0=k−k′=\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}^2}−\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}′^2}$$

But this is possible regardless of the approximation $m_e\to0$. What does it mean when it says that ##q^0## becomes 0 by approximating the electron mass to 0?

Also this is possible for any scattering angle $\theta$, but since it says that the mass cannot be ignored depending on the scattering angle ##\theta##, I assume that it is fixed to a Fixed Target frame and boosting is not taken into account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
 
Orodruin said:
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
So "spatial" means spacelike (##q^2<0##). Now I have solved problem 1! Thank you.
 
Hi Nasa,

I tried to fix your latex, which, I think, had an added close brace that caused other expressions to not render correctly.

Maybe you can look at your post and fix it the way you want

Also, notice the {X} I added because it seemed your \frac was missing a denominator.

Jedi
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K