Deep Inelastic Scattering

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nasa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inelastic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of deep inelastic scattering, specifically focusing on the conditions under which the four-momentum transfer ##q^0## can be approximated to zero. Participants explore the implications of approximating the electron mass to zero and the relationship between scattering angles and the mass of the electron.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions for ##q^0## to be zero and question the meaning of approximating the electron mass to zero. There is also a mention of the fixed target frame and its implications on scattering angles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing clarifications on the definitions of spacelike conditions and addressing formatting issues in the original posts. There is no explicit consensus yet, but participants are engaging with the material and attempting to clarify misunderstandings.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific constraints related to the scattering angle and the electron mass, which are under discussion but not resolved. The formatting of mathematical expressions has also been noted as a potential barrier to understanding.

Nasa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Consider deep inelastic scattering, where a high energy electron collides with a proton. The initial momentum of the electron is ##k^{\mu}## , the final state momentum is ##k'^{\mu}## , and the scattering angle is ##\theta##.
(1) Show that the transfer momentum ##q(=k-k')## is spatial in the limit where the electron mass is ignored.
(2) Find the scattering angle at which the electron mass cannot be ignored.
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{d^2\sigma}{d\Omega dE} $$

$$= \frac{\alpha^2}{4E^2}\frac{X}{\cos^2} \frac{\theta}{2}\sin^4$$

$$\frac{\theta}{2}(\frac{1}{\nu} F_2(x,Q)+\frac{2}{M}F_1(x,Q) \tan^2 \frac{\theta}{2})$$

where ##Q^2=-q^2,\quad x=\frac{Q^2}{2p\cdot q}##
To make ##q^0## 0, we just need to boost it so that ##|\boldsymbol{k}^{2}=|\boldsymbol{k}′|## ~.

$$q^0=k−k′=\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}^2}−\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}′^2}$$

But this is possible regardless of the approximation $m_e\to0$. What does it mean when it says that ##q^0## becomes 0 by approximating the electron mass to 0?

Also this is possible for any scattering angle $\theta$, but since it says that the mass cannot be ignored depending on the scattering angle ##\theta##, I assume that it is fixed to a Fixed Target frame and boosting is not taken into account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
 
Orodruin said:
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
So "spatial" means spacelike (##q^2<0##). Now I have solved problem 1! Thank you.
 
Hi Nasa,

I tried to fix your latex, which, I think, had an added close brace that caused other expressions to not render correctly.

Maybe you can look at your post and fix it the way you want

Also, notice the {X} I added because it seemed your \frac was missing a denominator.

Jedi
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K