Deep Inelastic Scattering

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nasa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inelastic
Nasa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Consider deep inelastic scattering, where a high energy electron collides with a proton. The initial momentum of the electron is ##k^{\mu}## , the final state momentum is ##k'^{\mu}## , and the scattering angle is ##\theta##.
(1) Show that the transfer momentum ##q(=k-k')## is spatial in the limit where the electron mass is ignored.
(2) Find the scattering angle at which the electron mass cannot be ignored.
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{d^2\sigma}{d\Omega dE} $$

$$= \frac{\alpha^2}{4E^2}\frac{X}{\cos^2} \frac{\theta}{2}\sin^4$$

$$\frac{\theta}{2}(\frac{1}{\nu} F_2(x,Q)+\frac{2}{M}F_1(x,Q) \tan^2 \frac{\theta}{2})$$

where ##Q^2=-q^2,\quad x=\frac{Q^2}{2p\cdot q}##
To make ##q^0## 0, we just need to boost it so that ##|\boldsymbol{k}^{2}=|\boldsymbol{k}′|## ~.

$$q^0=k−k′=\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}^2}−\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}′^2}$$

But this is possible regardless of the approximation $m_e\to0$. What does it mean when it says that ##q^0## becomes 0 by approximating the electron mass to 0?

Also this is possible for any scattering angle $\theta$, but since it says that the mass cannot be ignored depending on the scattering angle ##\theta##, I assume that it is fixed to a Fixed Target frame and boosting is not taken into account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
 
Orodruin said:
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
So "spatial" means spacelike (##q^2<0##). Now I have solved problem 1! Thank you.
 
Hi Nasa,

I tried to fix your latex, which, I think, had an added close brace that caused other expressions to not render correctly.

Maybe you can look at your post and fix it the way you want

Also, notice the {X} I added because it seemed your \frac was missing a denominator.

Jedi
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top