Deep sea changing properties of steel/iron?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter feyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of deep-sea pressure on iron and steel properties, particularly in relation to traditional hot forging techniques used in the Middle Ages. It concludes that while high pressure can slightly increase density, it does not alter the microstructure of iron in a permanent way, unlike the heating and hammering processes of hot forging. The pressure experienced in the Mariana Trench, approximately 110 MPa, is insufficient to induce significant phase transformations in iron or steel. For meaningful changes, pressures in the range of tens of GPa are necessary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metallurgy, specifically iron and steel properties
  • Knowledge of hot forging processes and their effects on microstructure
  • Familiarity with hydrostatic pressure effects on solid materials
  • Basic concepts of phase transitions in materials under high pressure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Phase Transitions in Solids Under High Pressure" for insights on high-pressure effects on iron
  • Explore the metallurgy of hot forging and its impact on iron and steel microstructures
  • Investigate the properties of materials under extreme pressures, focusing on GPa levels
  • Examine case studies of steel used in deep submersible vehicles for practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Metallurgists, materials scientists, engineers involved in forging processes, and researchers studying the effects of pressure on material properties will benefit from this discussion.

feyn
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Sorry, my question was simply too long and complex to fit into the title. Basically my question is this. In the middle ages Iron was treated by repeatedly hearting it up and hammering it on the anvil. As far as I understand this, this would create a more dense material.

So I asked myself, could you achieve the same effect (or an even better effect) by lowering my piece of iron into the deep sea, say down into the Marianna Trench. The pressure down tere is definitely way more then anything I could achieve on the anvil.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The metallurgy of iron is quite complex and I don't know too much about it. But I think the main effect of hammering was not to densen the iron but to reduce the carbon content of the iron which makes it less brittle. Increasing the pressure alone would only increase the density reversibly, i.e., when you bring the iron back to the surface, its volume would be as before.
 
So you could not get the iron to create a different crystal structure, which would stay this way when coming back ?
 
You are ignoring the "heating" part of the process. It isn't just to hammer it down. The heating part allows for the iron to be more malleable and affects the structure of the iron. Simply by imparting pressure will not be the same.

Zz.
 
feyn said:
Sorry, my question was simply too long and complex to fit into the title. Basically my question is this. In the middle ages Iron was treated by repeatedly hearting it up and hammering it on the anvil. As far as I understand this, this would create a more dense material.
One is describing the process of hot forging, which can change the microstructure depending on temperature, carbon content, and alloying elements. It does not change the density of Fe or steel at room temperature. Generally, hot or cold working/forging/extrusion/. . . processes are isochoric (i.e., constant volume/density).

Under hydrostatic compression, which is the case when a solid object is surrounded by a high pressure fluid it will undergo a slight decrease in volume (or increase in density), but it would not retain the higher density on return to atmospheric pressure. For non-spherical geometries, there would potentially be some deformation depending on geometry and conditions.

See some examples of steel used in deep submersible vehicles here - http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/dsv.htm

On 27 January 1960 the Trieste took two men to a depth of 35,800 ft ft (10,910 meters) -- the deepest spot in the ocean -- in the Mariana Trench near Guam. It took 5 hours to fall 7 miles, and when the explorers reached the bottom they stayed 20 minutes. No one has been able to come near that depth since then. At this depth, the pressure is over 8 tons per square inch. (~16 ksi, or 110 MPa)
A pressure of 110 MPa is not significant. Pressure like 10s of GPa would be significant.

One might be interested in Phase Transitions in Solids Under High Pressure
https://www.crcpress.com/Phase-Transitions-in-Solids-Under-High-Pressure/Blank-Estrin/9781466594258

Chapter 5 addresses iron and steels: Phase transformations in iron and its alloys at high pressure
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BOAS

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
5K