Definite integration by parts with sub

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the methodology for performing definite integrals using integration by parts and substitution. It clarifies that when applying substitution, one can either change the limits of integration or leave them unchanged. The example provided illustrates both methods using the integral \int_1^2 2x(x^2 + 1)^3 dx, demonstrating that both approaches yield the same result of \frac{609}{4}. This highlights the flexibility in handling limits during definite integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals
  • Familiarity with integration by parts
  • Knowledge of substitution in integrals
  • Basic calculus concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integration by parts in detail
  • Practice definite integrals with various substitution techniques
  • Explore advanced integration techniques such as trigonometric substitution
  • Learn about the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those seeking to master definite integrals and integration techniques.

h00zah
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hello, i am stuck on how to do this

I know how to do it for an indefinite integral, but it gets confusing for a definite integral. from my knowledge, when doing a definite integral, you have to change the upper and lower limit. but when it comes to integration by parts for a definite integral using substitution i get completely lost. my prof made an example using a indefinite integral, but not a definite integral.

is there a methodology to solving these?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
h00zah said:
hello, i am stuck on how to do this

I know how to do it for an indefinite integral, but it gets confusing for a definite integral. from my knowledge, when doing a definite integral, you have to change the upper and lower limit.
If you do the integration by making a substitution you can either 1) change the limits of integration according to the substitution and evaluate the antiderivative at the changed limits of integration; OR 2) leave the limits unchanged, get the antiderivative, undo the substitution, and then evaluate. In other words, you don't have to change the limits of integration.
h00zah said:
but when it comes to integration by parts for a definite integral using substitution i get completely lost. my prof made an example using a indefinite integral, but not a definite integral.

is there a methodology to solving these?

To the side as scratchwork, do the indefinite integral and find the antiderivative. When you have found the antiderivative (and have undone any substitutions you might have done), evaluate your antiderivative at the two original limits of integration.

Here's an example that is done both ways, using an ordinary substitution:
\int_1^2 2x(x^2 + 1)^3 dx

1. Limits of integration unchanged
u = x2 + 1, du = 2xdx
\int_1^2 2x(x^2 + 1)^3 dx = \int_{x = 1}^2 u^3 du = \left.\frac{u^4}{4}\right|_{x = 1}^2
= \left.\frac{(x^2 + 1)^4}{4}\right|_{x = 1}^2 = \frac{625}{4} - \frac{16}{4} = \frac{609}{4}

2. Limits of integration changed per substitution
u = x2 + 1, du = 2xdx
\int_1^2 2x(x^2 + 1)^3 dx = \int_{u = 2}^5 u^3 du = \left.\frac{u^4}{4}\right|_{u = 2}^5
= \frac{625}{4} - \frac{16}{4} = \frac{609}{4}

In #2, when x = 1, u = 12 + 1 = 2,
and when x = 2, u = 22 + 1 = 5
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
559
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K