Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Definition of a Gaussian wave packet for a Initial State

  1. Mar 21, 2014 #1
    Hi :)

    I'm reading a didactic paper and the author defined the initial state ket as

    |[itex]\Phi_{in}[/itex]> = [itex]{\int}dq\phi_{in}(q)[/itex]|q>

    where q is a coordinate and

    [itex]\phi_{in}(q)[/itex] = <q|[itex]\Phi_{in}[/itex]> = exp[itex]\left[\frac{-q^{2}}{4\Delta^{2}}\right][/itex]

    I don't know if I'm missing something but isn't this definition a little flawed? I mean if you calculate the inner product of <q| with the first equation, <q|q>=1, sure, but that does not eliminate the integral, right?

    I'm thinking the correct definition would be

    |[itex]\Phi_{in}[/itex]> = [itex]\phi_{in}(q)[/itex]|q>

    with

    [itex]\phi_{in}(q)[/itex] = <q|[itex]\Phi_{in}[/itex]> = exp[itex]\left[\frac{-q^{2}}{4\Delta^{2}}\right][/itex]


    Thank you
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 21, 2014 #2

    ChrisVer

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Just think of the unitary operator acting on [itex]|Φ_{in}>[/itex]
    [itex]\hat{1}|Φ_{in}>[/itex]
    but then, you also know (complete basis) that:
    [itex] \hat{1}= \sum_{q} |q><q| \rightarrow \int dq |q><q|[/itex]
    the arrow is for a continuous q variable....
    By that you get everything straightforwardly...

    In the same way, you can get:

    [itex] <Φ_{in}|Φ_{in}>= \int dq' dq φ^{*}(q')φ(q) <q'|q>[/itex]
    [itex] <Φ_{in}|Φ_{in}>= \int dq' dq φ^{*}(q')φ(q) δ(q'-q)[/itex]
    integrating out q' due to the delta function you get:
    [itex] <Φ_{in}|Φ_{in}>= \int dq φ^{*}(q)φ(q) =1[/itex]
     
  4. Mar 21, 2014 #3
    I see... so

    <q|[itex]\Phi_{in}[/itex]> = <q|[itex]\hat{I}[/itex]|[itex]\Phi_{in}[/itex]>

    right? But then

    <q|[itex]\Phi_{in}[/itex]> = <q|[itex]\hat{I}[/itex]|[itex]\Phi_{in}[/itex]> = [itex]{\int}dq\phi_{in}(q)[/itex]

    and the integral of [itex]\phi_{in}(q)[/itex] is not the same as = [itex]\phi_{in}(q)[/itex]

    what is happening here?

    Thank you.
     
  5. Mar 21, 2014 #4

    ChrisVer

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    you are confusing the brackets... If you have a continuous variable, then you can't generally say that <q|q>=1. This happens only for discrete ones, because the discrete version of dirac's delta function is the delta of kroenicker...
    In fact you have to generalize it for continuous variables, and as I used above:
    [itex] <q'|q>= δ(q'-q)[/itex]
    in the same way for discrete variables you had:
    [itex] <m|n>=δ_{mn}[/itex]

    also avoid using the same q everywhere... since you are already taking the bra <q| in <q|Φin> when you wrote the identity operator you should have used a new symbol like |q'><q'| or generally |something else><something else|
     
  6. Mar 21, 2014 #5
    wait for it... wait for it...

    I cannot use the very same variable in [itex]\hat{I}={\int}dq|q><q|[/itex] and in the <q| I took the inner product with, right? The identity operator must be something like

    [itex]\hat{I}={\int}dq'|q'><q'|[/itex]

    This will give me (when I take the inner product with <q|) a Dirac delta and save the day.

    I mean... this is the rigourous precedure, right?

    Thank you.
     
  7. Mar 21, 2014 #6
    Thank you very much :) Saved my day!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Definition of a Gaussian wave packet for a Initial State
  1. Gaussian wave packets (Replies: 1)

Loading...