Definition wind tunnel blockage ratio

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on defining the wind tunnel blockage ratio for a 2D wind tunnel model designed for a master's thesis. The model features a fixed hinged trailing edge flap and operates at low speeds of 70 to 100 m/s. The maximum blockage ratio is established at 5% to 10%, with emphasis on calculating the frontal area of the model in relation to the wind tunnel's cross-sectional area. Key insights include the importance of maintaining a small blockage to avoid significant flow distortion and the necessity of applying correction factors for solid and wake blockage as well as streamline curvature, as outlined in Alan Pope's "Low Speed Wind Tunnel Testing."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wind tunnel testing principles
  • Familiarity with blockage ratio concepts
  • Knowledge of pressure distribution measurement techniques
  • Experience with aerodynamic modeling and analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Low Speed Wind Tunnel Testing" by Alan Pope for detailed methodologies
  • Research correction factors for solid and wake blockage
  • Learn about streamline curvature effects in wind tunnel testing
  • Investigate the impact of model size on flow characteristics in wind tunnels
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, graduate students in fluid dynamics, wind tunnel technicians, and researchers involved in aerodynamic testing and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

BeSk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I’m designing a 2D wind tunnel model for my master thesis. It will be a profile equipped with a fixed hinged trailing edge flap. I’m going to measure at different angle of attacks and different flap settings at low speeds (about 70 to 100 m/s). The aim is to measure steady and unsteady pressure distributions. To calculate the maximum scale of the model I have to consider the maximum blockage ratio of 5% - 10% (which I found in the public literature).
My question is no which area of the model do I have to set in relation of the wind tunnel cross section area? Is it the in x-axis projected frontal area of the model (considering the angle of attack and the flap deflection) or is it the maximum thickness of the airfoil times model span?
The wind tunnel will has a closed test section and doesn’t have slotted walls.
I’m looking forward to your comments!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Total frontal area of the test article. You are trying to express how much of the wind tunnel is actually free to pass through when traveling past the article.
 
Why? Maybe you can explain your opinion in detail. What effect would happen to my results (such as pressure distribution) if I would build a too big model?
 
Pressures would be low if you build too big. Using too large of a model essentially creates a pair of Venturi nozzles. Keeping blockage small keeps the flow from feeling the effects of the walls.

Also, I blockage is too high, some wind tunnels have trouble starting.
 
Just to add to what bonehead said. There are corrections you can apply to your data for blockage effects and other tunnel wall effects such as streamline curvature as long as your model is not too big. If the model is too big the tunnel walls can qualitatively change the flow over your model in which case you can't correct for that.

You should check out "low speed wind tunnel testing" by pope if you are unfamiliar with these things.
 
Thank you for your replies. I have the book from Alan Pope right here on my desk. I’m going to use these correction factors for solid- & wake blockage as well as streamline curvature. The Question is how big can I build the model considering the correction factors? Regarding the Blockage Ratio Pope says that it is the “frontal area” of the model in relation to the cross sectional area of the tunnel. For me it was not indisputable what he meant with “frontal area”.
 
It means take a perpindicular slice through your test section and then project your model onto that. The area on that plane is your frontal area.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K