Degenerate Perturbation Theory

  • Thread starter xdrgnh
  • Start date
  • #1
413
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qm/lectures/node53.html

So I was reading this and I don't understand how he goes from 658 to 661 using the completeness relation. In 661 if you use the completeness relaton can you get rid of the I n,l''>s by doing the outer product and ignoring the inner product first? I mean if you get rid of I n,l''>s you get <n,l'I H_1 In,l1>which equals lamba etc.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
413
0
bump.
 
  • #3
Avodyne
Science Advisor
1,396
87
Too hard to read the dense notation, sorry.
 

Related Threads on Degenerate Perturbation Theory

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
645
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
627
Replies
13
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Top