Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Degenerate Perturbation Theory

  1. Jan 23, 2014 #1

    So I was reading this and I don't understand how he goes from 658 to 661 using the completeness relation. In 661 if you use the completeness relaton can you get rid of the I n,l''>s by doing the outer product and ignoring the inner product first? I mean if you get rid of I n,l''>s you get <n,l'I H_1 In,l1>which equals lamba etc.
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 5, 2014 #2
  4. Feb 9, 2014 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Too hard to read the dense notation, sorry.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook