Degrees of a Field Extension: How to Find Basis and Degree of a Field Extension

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the degree and basis of the field extension $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i) : \mathbb{Q}]$. Participants explore various methods to justify their findings, including the use of minimal polynomials and vector space arguments.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims that $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i) : \mathbb{Q}] = 4$ and proposes a basis $\{1, i, \sqrt{2}, i\sqrt{2}\}$, using the tower law to find the degrees of the extensions.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to justify why $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}) : \mathbb{Q}] = 2$, citing the minimal polynomial $p(x) = x^2 - 2$ for $\sqrt{2}$.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between showing that the degree is at least 2 and confirming it is exactly 2 through minimal polynomials.
  • A participant suggests that showing $\{1, \sqrt{2}\}$ generates $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ can also demonstrate the degree is 2, and discusses the irreducibility of polynomials as a method to establish field properties.
  • Another participant notes that for higher degree extensions, the polynomial approach can provide a basis by demonstrating linear independence of successive powers of a root.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the justification of degrees and bases, with some agreeing on the use of minimal polynomials while others are still clarifying their reasoning. There is no clear consensus on the best approach to demonstrate the properties of the field extensions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of proving irreducibility of polynomials and the implications of field properties, indicating that certain assumptions may not be universally accepted or understood.

shmounal
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've been asked to find $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i ): \mathbb{Q} ]$, and to write down a basis.

Now I know that $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i ): \mathbb{Q} ] = 4$, and that a basis could be $ \left \{ 1, i, \sqrt{2}, i\sqrt{2}\right \} $ it is whether the way I am explaining how I arrived here is satisfactory explanation.

Utilising the tower law I want to find both $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i ): \mathbb{Q(\sqrt{2})} ]$ and $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}): \mathbb{Q} ]$ and multiply.

For $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}): \mathbb{Q} ] = 2$ as $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}) = [a+b\sqrt{2} | a,b \in \mathbb{Q}]$ so $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ is a 2d vector space over $\mathbb{Q}$ with basis $\left \{1, \sqrt{2}\right \}$

I then use a similar argument for $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i ): \mathbb{Q(\sqrt{2})} ] = 2$ in that $\mathbb{Q}(i)(\sqrt{2}) = [a+bi | a,b \in \mathbb{Q(\sqrt{2})}]$

and the rest follows. I'm not sure if this is enough to show it rigidly. Some of my friends have been using minimal polynomials to show the different degrees and I don't entirely follow the logic!

Any help appreciated!

xx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shmounal said:
Some of my friends have been using minimal polynomials to show the different degrees and I don't entirely follow the logic!

Certainly you should justify why $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}): \mathbb{Q}]=2$ . As $\sqrt{2}\not\in \mathbb{Q}$ , then $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}): \mathbb{Q}]>1$ , but $p(x)=x^2-2\in\mathbb{Q}[x]$ satisfies $p(\sqrt{2})=0$ , so $p(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $\sqrt{2}$ and a basis of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ over the field $\mathbb{Q}$ is $\{(\sqrt{2})^0,(\sqrt{2})^1\}=\{1,\sqrt{2}\}$ . In the same way , $i\not\in\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ , then ...
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help! Think I understand now.

What I was doing only showed that the degree was 2 or more while finding the min polynomial says it must be exactly 2?

i.e. $p(x) = x^2 + 1 \in\mathbb{Q} (\sqrt{2})[x]$ satisfies $p(i) = 0$, ...
 
shmounal said:
What I was doing only showed that the degree was 2 or more while finding the min polynomial says it must be exactly 2?

Right, that is the question.

i.e. $p(x) = x^2 + 1 \in\mathbb{Q} (\sqrt{2})[x]$ satisfies $p(i) = 0$, ...

Also right.
 
another way to show that [Q(√2):Q] = 2 is to show that {1,√2} generate Q(√2), to do this, you need to prove that every element of Q(√2) is of the form a+b√2 (i.e. that the set of all such elements with a,b in Q does indeed form a field, and this field is contained in any field that contains Q and √2).

finding an irreducible polynomial of minimal degree is often easier, because of the isomorphism Q(√2) ≅ Q[x]/(x^2 - 2). note that proving x^2 - 2 is irreducible over Q is the same as showing √2 is irrational, something often glossed over as "obvious" and stated without proof. a similar consideration holds for i, and to be really nit-picky, showing x^2+1 is irreducible over Q(√2)[x] one ought to appeal to the fact that Q(√2) is a sub-field of the reals, which has no square roots of negative numbers (a consequence of being a totally ordered field).

when one has a cubic (or higher) extension, the polynomial approach really shines, because then one knows that successive powers of a root (up to one less than the degree of the minimal polynomial, in this case: 2, since we have a cubic) are linearly independent (or else the root would have a minimal polynomial of lesser degree). so the polynomial itself provides the basis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K