Degrees of a Field Extension: How to Find Basis and Degree of a Field Extension

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the degree and basis of the field extension $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i) : \mathbb{Q}]$, which is established as 4. The basis is identified as $\{1, i, \sqrt{2}, i\sqrt{2}\}$. The participants utilize the tower law to compute $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i) : \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})] = 2$ and $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}) : \mathbb{Q}] = 2$, confirming the overall degree. The use of minimal polynomials, specifically $p(x) = x^2 - 2$ for $\sqrt{2}$ and $p(x) = x^2 + 1$ for $i$, is emphasized as a rigorous method for establishing these degrees.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field extensions and their degrees
  • Familiarity with minimal polynomials and their properties
  • Knowledge of the tower law in field theory
  • Basic concepts of vector spaces over fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of minimal polynomials in field extensions
  • Learn about the tower law and its applications in field theory
  • Explore the concept of vector spaces and bases in the context of field extensions
  • Investigate irreducibility of polynomials over various fields
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in field theory and its applications in understanding field extensions and their properties.

shmounal
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've been asked to find $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i ): \mathbb{Q} ]$, and to write down a basis.

Now I know that $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i ): \mathbb{Q} ] = 4$, and that a basis could be $ \left \{ 1, i, \sqrt{2}, i\sqrt{2}\right \} $ it is whether the way I am explaining how I arrived here is satisfactory explanation.

Utilising the tower law I want to find both $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i ): \mathbb{Q(\sqrt{2})} ]$ and $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}): \mathbb{Q} ]$ and multiply.

For $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}): \mathbb{Q} ] = 2$ as $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}) = [a+b\sqrt{2} | a,b \in \mathbb{Q}]$ so $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ is a 2d vector space over $\mathbb{Q}$ with basis $\left \{1, \sqrt{2}\right \}$

I then use a similar argument for $[ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, i ): \mathbb{Q(\sqrt{2})} ] = 2$ in that $\mathbb{Q}(i)(\sqrt{2}) = [a+bi | a,b \in \mathbb{Q(\sqrt{2})}]$

and the rest follows. I'm not sure if this is enough to show it rigidly. Some of my friends have been using minimal polynomials to show the different degrees and I don't entirely follow the logic!

Any help appreciated!

xx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shmounal said:
Some of my friends have been using minimal polynomials to show the different degrees and I don't entirely follow the logic!

Certainly you should justify why $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}): \mathbb{Q}]=2$ . As $\sqrt{2}\not\in \mathbb{Q}$ , then $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}): \mathbb{Q}]>1$ , but $p(x)=x^2-2\in\mathbb{Q}[x]$ satisfies $p(\sqrt{2})=0$ , so $p(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $\sqrt{2}$ and a basis of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ over the field $\mathbb{Q}$ is $\{(\sqrt{2})^0,(\sqrt{2})^1\}=\{1,\sqrt{2}\}$ . In the same way , $i\not\in\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ , then ...
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help! Think I understand now.

What I was doing only showed that the degree was 2 or more while finding the min polynomial says it must be exactly 2?

i.e. $p(x) = x^2 + 1 \in\mathbb{Q} (\sqrt{2})[x]$ satisfies $p(i) = 0$, ...
 
shmounal said:
What I was doing only showed that the degree was 2 or more while finding the min polynomial says it must be exactly 2?

Right, that is the question.

i.e. $p(x) = x^2 + 1 \in\mathbb{Q} (\sqrt{2})[x]$ satisfies $p(i) = 0$, ...

Also right.
 
another way to show that [Q(√2):Q] = 2 is to show that {1,√2} generate Q(√2), to do this, you need to prove that every element of Q(√2) is of the form a+b√2 (i.e. that the set of all such elements with a,b in Q does indeed form a field, and this field is contained in any field that contains Q and √2).

finding an irreducible polynomial of minimal degree is often easier, because of the isomorphism Q(√2) ≅ Q[x]/(x^2 - 2). note that proving x^2 - 2 is irreducible over Q is the same as showing √2 is irrational, something often glossed over as "obvious" and stated without proof. a similar consideration holds for i, and to be really nit-picky, showing x^2+1 is irreducible over Q(√2)[x] one ought to appeal to the fact that Q(√2) is a sub-field of the reals, which has no square roots of negative numbers (a consequence of being a totally ordered field).

when one has a cubic (or higher) extension, the polynomial approach really shines, because then one knows that successive powers of a root (up to one less than the degree of the minimal polynomial, in this case: 2, since we have a cubic) are linearly independent (or else the root would have a minimal polynomial of lesser degree). so the polynomial itself provides the basis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K