Del operator crossed with a scalar times a vector proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the identity involving the "Del" operator crossed with a scalar times a vector, specifically the equation ∇×(φV) = (φ∇)×V - V×(∇φ). Participants utilize the summation convention and Levi-Civita symbols to break down the proof. Key steps include applying the product rule for differentiation and reconstructing vectors from their components. The proof is confirmed to align with standard mathematical and physics literature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically the "Del" operator.
  • Familiarity with the Levi-Civita symbol and its application in cross products.
  • Knowledge of the product rule for differentiation in vector calculus.
  • Experience with summation convention notation in mathematical proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol in vector calculus.
  • Learn about the product rule for differentiation in the context of vector fields.
  • Explore the application of the "Del" operator in various vector calculus identities.
  • Review examples of vector reconstruction from component forms in physics and mathematics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics and physics, particularly those focusing on vector calculus, differential equations, and mathematical proofs involving the "Del" operator.

galactic
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
"Del" operator crossed with a scalar times a vector proof

Homework Statement


Prove the following identity (we use the summation convention notation)

\bigtriangledown\times(\phi\vec{V})=(\phi \bigtriangledown)\times\vec{V}-\vec{V}\times(\bigtriangledown)\phi

Homework Equations



equation for del, the gradient, curl..

The Attempt at a Solution



im kind of confused on the first step...I broke it down into the following; however, levi civita symbols aren't my cup of tea and I get pretty confused about it...anyway here's what I did:

\bigtriangledown\times(\phi\vec{V})=(\epsilon_{ijk})\partial_i\vec{V}\phi\hat{x}_k

I don't know if this first step is right or if I decomposed the cross product right ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


You should have the j:th component of V in your expression,
\nabla \times (\phi \vec{V}) = \epsilon_{ijk} \partial_i (\phi V_j) \hat{x}_k
 


The form you've written is completely equal to the one seen in math/physics books

\nabla\times \left(\phi\vec{V}\right) = \nabla\phi\times\vec{V} + \phi\nabla\times\vec{V}
 


Thanks for the replies, I'm just not sure what to do after what clamtrox said to do, the whole proofing business if pretty new to me :/
 


You need two more steps. Apply the product rule for differentiation and then once you obtain a sum of two terms, reconstruct vectors from their components.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K