Delayed choice experiment article on science alert

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the delayed choice experiment and its interpretation, particularly focusing on a potentially misleading phrase in a Science Alert article regarding the behavior of atoms when a second grating is introduced. Participants express confusion over whether the article correctly describes the atom's path choices, suggesting that the phrasing should imply the removal of the second grating instead. The conversation also delves into the nature of wave-particle duality, with some arguing that the wave-like behavior of particles does not imply they can be both wave and particle simultaneously. The distinction between a quantum state and its wave function is highlighted, emphasizing that the wave function's oscillation is not physically observable. Overall, the thread critiques the clarity of the article and the interpretations of quantum mechanics presented within it.
  • #31
bhobba said:
That's got nothing to o with anything - certainly not the wave particle duality.
I don't know any science advisor on this forum that adheres to it except as a heuristic and maybe useful at the beginner level.
Thanks
Bill
I rest my case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 157 ·
6
Replies
157
Views
15K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K