Demystifying the Chain Rule in Calculus - Comments

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Chain Rule in calculus, particularly focusing on its conceptual understanding and the challenges students face when first encountering it. Participants share their thoughts on an article that aims to clarify these issues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express appreciation for the article, noting that it addresses common difficulties students face with the Chain Rule.
  • One participant mentions that the article helped alleviate their worries about understanding the Chain Rule, describing it as "magical."
  • A participant critiques the article's readability due to the light type used, suggesting an increase in saturation for better visibility.
  • Another participant discusses the notation used in partial derivatives, proposing alternatives to clarify the expression of derivatives in the context of the Chain Rule.
  • One comment introduces the concept of directional derivatives in multivariate calculus, suggesting that understanding derivatives as linear maps can provide a conceptual framework for the Chain Rule.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the article is helpful and insightful, but there are differing opinions on the clarity of the notation and presentation, indicating that some aspects remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the notation and its implications in the context of the Chain Rule, highlighting the potential for misunderstanding among students. The discussion includes various interpretations of how to express derivatives and the challenges of notational clarity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students beginning their studies in calculus, educators seeking to understand common student challenges, and anyone interested in the conceptual underpinnings of the Chain Rule.

PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
29,618
Reaction score
21,430
Greg Bernhardt submitted a new PF Insights post

Demystifying the Chain Rule in Calculus
chainrule.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 

Attachments

  • chainrule.png
    chainrule.png
    11.8 KB · Views: 1,134
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Morgner_Sant, wormbread, lekh2003 and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Great insight, it addresses the main issues an average student (and i myself had) might stumble into when coming in first contact with the chain rule.
 
Last edited:
This is a very insightful insight. I have just begun studying calculus and I was extremely worried about this magical chain rule. This article was helpful in demystifying whatever I could understand from the insight :bow:.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and Delta2
The light type used, 33% saturation, makes it difficult to read. Any chance of increasing the amount of "ink" used? This thread, as all others, uses 50-75% saturation. And the reply box I'm typing in uses 98% saturation.
Thanks.
 
Thank you PeroK, I've found myself lost with things like this a couple of times and I agree when you say that the differential notation lacks of many things. The last issue that I lately found confusing was that you pointed out in equation (8):

Having a function f(g(x,t),x) write the partial derivative of f wrt x without having written the same term in both sides of the equation. :woot:

One option would be , being fi the partial derivative of f wrt its i-th argument, write fx = f1(x,t) gx+f2 ,
this way you could avoid writting f2 again as fx and it would be the same as you suggested there (1,2 instead of X,Y).
Another option: Using differential notation you would have to use parenthesis and write explicitly that
f1 = (∂f / ∂g) keeping the 2nd argument of f fixed, but that would bring notational clustering so better stick with the first option. :P

Fortunately, some people will read this article and they won't have to question all their knowwledge again as I did in that moment.
 
Nice article.

I would only comment that in multivariate calculus one inevitably gets into directional derivatives. To understand these I think it is helpful to think of the derivative(or differential) of a function as a linear map on direction vectors. The Chain Rule then says that if you compose two functions, the derivative of the composition is the composition of the derivatives. In classical multivariable calculus this means you matrix multiply the Jacobian matrices.

Also thinking of the derivative in this way gives a conceptual framework for the Chain Rule.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and mathwonk

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K