Density floating problem, wood and lead

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of lead required to ensure a block of wood (mass: 3.47 kg, density: 628 kg/m³) floats in water with 84.8% of its volume submerged. The lead's density is 1.13 × 104 kg/m³. Two scenarios are considered: lead attached to the top of the wood and lead attached to the bottom. The key equations involve buoyant force (Fb) and the relationship between the weights of the wood and lead, with specific attention to the submerged volume and the density of water.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle
  • Familiarity with density calculations
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Knowledge of gravitational force in fluid mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study buoyant force calculations in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about Archimedes' principle and its applications
  • Explore density and volume relationships in physics
  • Investigate the effects of different materials on buoyancy
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching fluid mechanics, and anyone interested in practical applications of buoyancy principles.

SadPanda6022
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
A block of wood has a mass of 3.47 kg and a density of 628 kg/m3. It is to be loaded with lead (1.13 × 104 kg/m3) so that it will float in water with 0.848 of its volume submerged. What mass of lead is needed if the lead is attached to (a) the top of the wood and (b) the bottom of the wood?

2016_04_24_12_32_44_WileyPLUS.jpg


alright so i have been working on this for a second and I am stuck on the second part...I found the solution to the book problem, it shows me how to do it but doesn't really flush out the steps. see below for the book problem solution.

Homework Equations


2016_04_24_12_33_22.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


Sooo, with the above in mind, where did the (density of water)/(density of lead) come from and why is that extra M(lead) on the Fb side? I start with Fb=(Dw)(Vwood + Vlead)g, with Fb going to the above (Mwood+Mlead)g, g cancels...but I guess I am stuck there..

I tried going from that to solving for Mlead but it didn't really work out..I am checking my units and stuff and it looks ok...

in the example the 0.900 is equivalent to the 0.848, and i just treat it as a percent and multiply it in as shown. Are they using the density of water over the density of lead as a relative density? I don't know..I am sure it's just a dumb mistake..

Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the volume of the wood? What is the weight of the wood? What volume of wood is submerged? (This is the volume of water that the wood displaces)

Let M be the mass of lead. In terms of M, what is the weight of the lead? In terms of M, hat is the total weight of wood plus lead?

In the case of lead on top of the wood, there is no lead submerged. So what is the buoyant force of the water acting on the wood? How does this compare with the weight of the wood plus lead? You now have an equation for calculating the mass of lead M.

In the case that the lead is fastened underneath the wood, the entire block of lead is submerged. So, what is the volume of wood plus lead submerged (in terms of M)? What is the buoyant force of the water acting on the submerged wood and lead? How does this compare with the weight of the wood plus lead. You now have an equation for calculating the mass of lead M for this case.

chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SadPanda6022
Hey chet!

Yes, yes, I got all of that. I actually think I figured it out. I was thinking for (b) that the equation i needed to formulate was:
g(mlead +mwood)=(%)(D_water)(Volume_wood + Volume_lead)g

but looking closer It was:
g(mlead +mwood)=(%)(D_water)(g)(Volume_wood) + (D_water)(Volume_lead)(g)

They just wrote it weird in the example. I just didnt "see" how the density of water and gravity had been multiplied through. Knew it was a simple thing.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K