Density Matrix for Spin 1/2 particle in a magnetic field

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around creating the density matrix for a spin-1/2 particle in thermal equilibrium in a magnetic field along the x-direction. The user initially struggles with deriving energy eigenvalues from the Hamiltonian, leading to confusion about degeneracy. They find that the off-diagonal nature of the σ_x matrix results in a single energy eigenstate, unlike the diagonal σ_z matrix which yields two states. A correction reveals an algebra mistake, clarifying that the energy equation actually has two solutions, resolving the confusion about degeneracy. The interaction of the magnetic field direction with the spin states is key to understanding the energy eigenvalues.
khfrekek92
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

I am trying to create the density matrix for a spin-1/2 particle that is in thermal equilibrium at temperature T, and in a constant magnetic field oriented in the x-direction. This is a fairly straightforward process, but I'm getting stuck on one little part.

Before starting I need to find the energy eigenvalues (In order to find the partition function):

H=-μS⋅B=-μBσ_x

But since σ_x is an off-diagonal matrix (unlike σ_z), plugging this Hamiltonian into the Schrodinger Equation yields two equations (By letting |ψ>=(ψ1,ψ2))

Eψ1=-μBψ2
Eψ2=-μBψ1

And then solving these like normal for E gives us only one energy eigenstate for this system (with degeneracy 2):

E=μB

However, when the magnetic field was in the z direction, the z pauli spin matrix was diagonal and didn't switch the positions of ψ1 and ψ2, which gave me two energy eigenstates (±μB).

So my question is, why would a magnetic field in the x-direction NOT break the degeneracy of the energy eigenstates, while in the z-direction it does? These directions are completely arbitrary and should yield the same results, right?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have made a mistake. Your equations lead to ##E^2=(\mu B)^2##, which has two solutions.
 
Ah man such a small algebra error! That makes everything work out perfectly, duh! Thank you so much!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
958