Density matrix of an ammonia molecule

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the time evolution of the density matrix for an ammonia molecule, specifically starting from an initial state represented by ##\rho(0) = | + \rangle \langle + |##. Participants are exploring the implications of the Hamiltonian's eigenstates on the density matrix's evolution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the density matrix and its time evolution, questioning the correctness of terms involving sine and imaginary factors. There are attempts to clarify the contributions of eigenstates and the implications of Hermiticity in the context of density matrices.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights regarding the presence of imaginary factors in the density matrix, while others are questioning the calculations and the resulting form of the matrix. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical expressions involved, with no clear consensus on the correctness of the original poster's density matrix.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption of specific eigenstates and eigenvalues related to the Hamiltonian, and there is a focus on ensuring the density matrix remains Hermitian throughout the discussion.

Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Consider a ammonia molecule ##NH_{3}##. The ##N## atom can be above (state ##| + \rangle## or below (state ##| - \rangle##) the plane formed by the ##H## atoms. The hamiltonian of the system ##\hat{H}## is showed below, writed in the ##\left \{ |+ \rangle, |- \rangle \right \}## basis. Knowing that in ##t = 0## the system is in the state ##| + \rangle##, the objective is determine the density matrix ##\rho## at any time ##t > 0##.
Relevant Equations
H = \begin{pmatrix}
E_{0} & -A\\
-A & E_{0}
\end{pmatrix}
In ##t = 0##, we have ##\rho (0) = | + \rangle \langle + |##. The time evolution of the density matrix is given by ##\rho(t) = e^{-i\hat{H}t} \rho (0) e^{i\hat{H}t}## (I am considering ##\hbar = 1##). I can write the state ##| + \rangle ## as a linear combination of the eigenstates of the hamiltonian. Making this, it's easy to compute the actions of the time evolutions operators. So I get the ##\rho (t)## writed white the eigenkets of ##\hat{H}##. Writing these eigenkets in the basis ##\left \{ |+ \rangle, |- \rangle \right \}##, I get the following result: $$\rho (t) = \frac{1}{2}\left \{ \left [ 1 + cos(2At) ] | + \rangle \langle + | + [1 - cos(2At)] | - \rangle \langle - | + sin(2At)| - \rangle \langle + | - sin(2At)| + \rangle \langle - | \right ] \right \}.$$It look likes wrong to me, because of the two last terms. If they were canceled, this density matrix would make sense, but the sum of them is not zero, is it? So it's more likely that I missed the calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot a couple of ##i##'s.
 
How so?
 
How did you get the sines?
 
I will put the calculations: being ##| 1 \rangle## and ##| 2 \rangle## the eigenstates of ##\hat{H}## with eigenvalues ##E_{0} - A## and ##E_{0} + A##, respectively. So $$| 1 \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}( |+\rangle + |-\rangle ),$$ $$| 2 \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}( |+\rangle - |- \rangle).$$ Writing ##\rho(0)## using these kets and applying the time evolutions operators to them, we get $$\rho (t) = \frac{1}{2}\left ( |1 \rangle \langle 1 | + e^{-i2At}|1 \rangle \langle 2 | + e^{i2At}|2 \rangle \langle 1 | + |2 \rangle \langle 2 |\right ).$$ Rewriting this in the ##\left\{ |+\rangle, |-\rangle \right\}## basis, we have $$\rho (t) = \frac{1}{4} \left [ (|+ \rangle \langle + | - |+ \rangle \langle - | - |- \rangle \langle + | + |- \rangle \langle - |) \\ + e^{-i2At}(|+ \rangle \langle + | + |+ \rangle \langle - | - |- \rangle \langle + | - |- \rangle \langle - |) \\ + e^{i2At}(|+ \rangle \langle + | - |+ \rangle \langle - | + |- \rangle \langle + | - |- \rangle \langle - |)\\ + (|+ \rangle \langle + | + |+ \rangle \langle - | + |- \rangle \langle + | + |- \rangle \langle - |) \right ].$$ From this follow my answer. I get the sines combining the exponentials.
 
$$
e^{-i 2 At} - e^{i 2 At} = -2 i \sin(2 A t)
$$
 
Oh, it's true... I don't believe I have forgotten this haha. But my density matrix is incorret, isn't it? it couldn't have a imaginary factor multiplying an external product...
 
I didn't check the calculation, but having ##i## in the off-diagonal elements is fine as long as your density matrix is Hermitian.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K