Can Dependent Variables Defy E(X)E(Y) = E(XY) in Probability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter georg gill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between dependent variables X and Y in probability, specifically addressing the condition E(X)E(Y) = E(XY). It is established that if X and Y are dependent, this equality does not hold. A key example provided involves flipping a coin, where X and Y represent outcomes based on the coin's state. The expected values E(X) and E(Y) are both zero, while E(XY) equals 1/4, illustrating the failure of the equality. The discussion concludes with a method to demonstrate the lack of independence using joint probability calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of expected values in probability theory
  • Knowledge of independent and dependent random variables
  • Familiarity with joint probability distributions
  • Basic concepts of probability and statistics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of expected values in dependent random variables
  • Learn about joint probability distributions and their applications
  • Explore examples of dependent variables in real-world scenarios
  • Investigate the implications of independence in probability theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in statistics, data science, and probability theory, particularly those interested in understanding the nuances of dependent variables and their expected values.

georg gill
Messages
151
Reaction score
6
if X and Y are independent then E(X)E(Y)=E(XY)

I have found a lot of examples for this for example if X-values gives tail or head and Y is the sides of a square

but i can't find an example for a dependent function where E(X)E(Y)=E(XY) does not apply and I want to have an example tht shows mathematically that E(X)E(Y)=E(XY) does not apply- Does anyone have such an illustrating example that describers this mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think an example would be the case where X gives the number of hearts in a poker hand and Y gives the number of red cards in a poker hand. Here knowing X affects the expected value of Y. Isn't this really a prob/stats question rather than a number theory one, though?
 
The best example is the drastic example. Flip a coin - X=1/2 if the coin is heads, X=-1/2 if the coin is tails. Y=1/2 if the same coin is heads, Y=-1/2 if the coin is tails. E(X)=E(Y)=0 but XY=1/4 regardless of whether the coin is heads or tails, so E(XY)=1/4
 
Office_Shredder said:
The best example is the drastic example. Flip a coin - X=1/2 if the coin is heads, X=-1/2 if the coin is tails. Y=1/2 if the same coin is heads, Y=-1/2 if the coin is tails. E(X)=E(Y)=0 but XY=1/4 regardless of whether the coin is heads or tails, so E(XY)=1/4

thanks! That was a neat efficient proof:)

Thanks both!EDIT: I did unfortunately run into an issue for my self here. How can I show that the quoted example above is not independent?
 
Last edited:
Office_Shredder, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think in this example you'll want to go about it like this:

In general, the way you show independence is that P[X=x and Y=y] = P[X=x]*P[Y=y]. If you do P[X=1/2 and Y= -1/2], that probability is 0, because the same coin cannot be heads-up and tails-up at once, but P[X=1/2]*P[Y= -1/2] = 1/2 probability of heads*1/2 probability of tails = 1/4. Hence they aren't independent, because 0 != 1/4.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K