Derivating a Yukawa theory loop-integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ace10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory Yukawa
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on challenges in computing a derivative of a loop integral in Yukawa theory, specifically referencing Peskin and Schroeder's "Introduction to QFT." The first question addresses the transition of the gamma function's argument from "1-d/2" to "2-d/2," which occurs when taking the derivative of the denominator, yielding a factor of "1-d/2" and utilizing the identity zΓ(z) = Γ(z+1). The second question requests a detailed calculation to clarify the final form, which includes "x(1-x)" in the numerator and a denominator with the power "2-d/2," while the inquirer believes it should be "-d/2." The discussion emphasizes the need for clear derivation steps to resolve these integral calculations. Overall, the thread seeks assistance in understanding complex aspects of loop integrals in quantum field theory.
Ace10
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello fellow physicists,

during some calculations for a project regarding Renormalization, I had a difficulty in computing a derivative of a loop integral in Yukawa theory. The thing I'm reffering to can be found in Peskin and Schroeder's book, Introduction to QFT , in Chapter 10 page 329-330.

Question #1:

How the gamma function's argument changes from "1-d/2" (10.33) to "2-d/2" (10.35) ?

Question #2:

Could please somebody show me a detailed calculation of the derivation? I cannot get the finel form, with "x(1-x)" in the numerator and plus the denominator has power "2-d/2" and i think that normally the power should be "-d/2"


Thank you very much in advance..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ace10 said:
How the gamma function's argument changes from "1-d/2" (10.33) to "2-d/2" (10.35) ?
When you take the derivative of the denominator, a factor of 1-d/2 comes out, and then use the identity zΓ(z) = Γ(z+1).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K