Derivation of Differential Equation with Parameter Pr and Solution Integration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the differential equation θ'' / θ' = Pr * f''' / f'', where Pr is a constant parameter and θ and f are functions of the independent variable η. The solution involves integrating the equation twice, leading to the result θ(η, Pr) = C₁ ∫₀^η [f'']^Pr dη + C₂. The key insight is recognizing that the initial differential relation can be transformed into a logarithmic form, allowing for straightforward integration to derive θ'.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically second-order equations.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, including integration by parts.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic identities and their application in calculus.
  • Basic concepts of parameters in mathematical functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integrating differential equations, focusing on second-order equations.
  • Learn about the application of logarithmic differentiation in solving differential equations.
  • Explore the implications of parameters in differential equations and their solutions.
  • Review examples of integrating functions of the form θ(η, Pr) in mathematical texts.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations, as well as educators looking for effective teaching methods for integration techniques.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I am going through a derivation in my text and we come across the following diff EQ:

θ'' / θ' = Pr* f''' / f''​

where Pr = constant (it ia a parameter) and both θ and f are functions of the same independent variable η.

The Attempt at a Solution



The result we arrive at is

[tex]\theta(\eta,Pr) =C_1 \int_0^\eta [f'']^{Pr}\,d\eta +C_2\qquad(2)[/tex]​

and he the author says we get to that results by "integrating (1) twice ..."

I guess I am a little confused as to how to integrate this? Do I need to do it by parts? Or move the dη's around or what? Any thoughts? Am I making this too difficult?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it's just a trick to observe that the initial differential relation

[tex]\frac{\theta''}{\theta'} = P_{r} \frac{f'''}{f''}[/tex]

is nothing but

[tex](\ln \theta')' = P_{r} (\ln f'')'[/tex]

in disguise.

Integrating once we get

[tex]\ln \theta ' = P_{r} \ln f'' + \ln C[/tex]

from which

[tex]\theta' = C (f'')^{P_{r}}[/tex]

Integrate now from 0 to [itex]\eta[/itex] and you'll get the answer in the book.
 
dextercioby said:
No, it's just a trick to observe that the initial differential relation

[tex]\frac{\theta''}{\theta'} = P_{r} \frac{f'''}{f''}[/tex]

is nothing but

[tex](\ln \theta')' = P_{r} (\ln f'')'[/tex]

in disguise.

Integrating once we get

[tex]\ln \theta ' = P_{r} \ln f'' + \ln C[/tex]

from which

[tex]\theta' = C (f'')^{P_{r}}[/tex]

Integrate now from 0 to [itex]\eta[/itex] and you'll get the answer in the book.

Oh wow! Nice catch :smile: Thanks dextercioby
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K