Graduate Derivation of Euler Lagrange, variations

Click For Summary
The discussion critiques a simple localized geometric derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation, highlighting its lack of generality compared to Lagrange's standard derivation. The localized approach, while intuitive for specific problems like a hanging rope, does not apply broadly to all variational problems. It is emphasized that the Euler-Lagrange equation is applicable under certain conditions related to differentiability, which must be met for proper use. Participants express interest in the subject and acknowledge the need for a deeper understanding of the calculus of variations. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of generality in mathematical derivations.
cosmic onion
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
What is wrong with the simple localised geometric derivation of the Euler Lagrange equation. As opposed to the standard derivation that Lagrange provided.

Sorry I haven't mastered writing mathematically using latex. I will have a look at this over the next few days.

More clarification. I seen a simple derivation that looked at the change in position of a length of rope at a single point and the increase in the gradient to the left and decrease of the gradient to the right at the same point, adding up these variations gave a neat and easy derivation of euler lagrange and made the terms make sense

What's wrong get with the simple euler derivation.

Sorry may have to rewrite this once I have practiced latex.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cosmic onion said:
What is wrong with the simple localised geometric derivation of the Euler Lagrange equation. As opposed to the standard derivation that Lagrange provided.
By 'localized geometric derivation', do you mean something like in this site?
The derivation given there is not wrong, but it's also not general. Euler-Lagrange equation gives you the differential equation for solving the function which makes certain functional stationary, it does not pertain only to the shape of a hanging rope under gravity or to only physical problems, instead it's one of the disciplines in math just like differential and integral calculus, linear algebra etc.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply .
Yes that's exactly the derivation I was thinking about.

So your saying this derivation is not general as it pertains to this particular problem as opposed to the accepted lag range derivation that pertains to all variational problems of this type. ? And that's the answer.

Hope I got this right.
 
cosmic onion said:
So your saying this derivation is not general as it pertains to this particular problem as opposed to the accepted lag range derivation that pertains to all variational problems of this type. ?
I don't think "all variational problems" is the right phrase here. I believe the variational problem should satisfy a set of conditions, one of which is the differentiability behavior, that must be satisfied by the functions before it can be treated using Euler-Lagrange equation. You should be able to find these conditions in calculus of variation literature.
 
Thank you for this insight. Only started to learn the subject. Find it very interesting and it also seems to have an interesting past.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K