Derivation of ideal gas heat capacity relationship

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the relationship between heat capacities at constant pressure and constant volume (C_p - C_v = nR) for ideal gases. Participants explore the definitions and assumptions involved in the derivation, particularly focusing on the conditions under which certain derivatives are taken.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about why the derivative $$\frac{dH}{dT}$$ can be equated to $$\left( \frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_p$$, questioning the assumption of constant pressure.
  • Others clarify that C_p and C_v are defined as specific heats at constant pressure and constant volume, respectively, suggesting that the derivation relies on these definitions rather than assumptions.
  • One participant notes that for an ideal gas, both enthalpy (H) and internal energy (U) depend solely on temperature, which may justify the use of these derivatives under the specified conditions.
  • A later reply provides a detailed derivation, breaking down the relationships and showing how the first law of thermodynamics applies under constant volume and constant pressure conditions.
  • Some participants reiterate that the equality of the derivatives under different conditions is a consequence of the temperature dependence of H, rather than a strict assumption.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of C_p and C_v, but there is some disagreement and confusion regarding the justification for the assumptions made in the derivation. The discussion remains somewhat unresolved as participants clarify their understanding without reaching a consensus on the initial confusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the importance of definitions and the conditions under which thermodynamic quantities are evaluated. There are unresolved questions about the implications of these definitions in the context of the derivation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in physical chemistry or thermodynamics who are grappling with the concepts of heat capacities and their derivations for ideal gases.

jasonRF
Science Advisor
Messages
1,534
Reaction score
606
TL;DR
Do not understand a derivation in Physical Chemistry by McQuarrie and Simon.
The text derives C_p-C_v=nR for ideal gasses. They start with $$H = U + PV = U + nRT$$ for ideal gas. Since U is only a function of temperature for an ideal gas, the right-hand side is only a function of temperature so $$\frac{dH}{dT} = \frac{dU}{dT} + nR$$. Now the text does something I don't understand.

First they set $$\frac{dH}{dT} = \left( \frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_p = C_p$$ Why can they assume constant pressure here? I feel like I am missing something fundamental.

Similarly, they set $$\frac{dU}{dT} = \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T} \right)_V = C_v$$. Again, I don't understand why they can assume constant volume.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks!
Jason
 
Science news on Phys.org
It's a matter of definition, not assumption.

##C_p## denotes specific heat at constant pressure.
##C_v## denotes specific heat at constant volume.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF
kuruman said:
It's a matter of definition, not assumption.

##C_p## denotes specific heat at constant pressure.
##C_v## denotes specific heat at constant volume.
Thanks for the reply. I don't think I asked my question very clearly. I understand the definitions of ##C_v## and ##C_p##. What I don't understand is why $$\frac{dH}{d T} = \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_P$$ is true.
 
For an ideal gas, H and U depend only on T.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF
You have
$$\mathrm{d} U = T \mathrm{d} S - p \mathrm{d} V,$$
and thus
$$C_{\text{V}}=T \left (\frac{\partial S}{\partial T} \right)_V=\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial T} \right)_{V}.$$
Further from ##H=U+pV## you get
$$\mathrm{d} H = T \mathrm{d} S + V \mathrm{d} p,$$
and thus
$$C_{\text{p}}=T \left (\frac{\partial S}{\partial T} \right)_p=\left (\frac{\partial H}{\partial T} \right)_{p}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF
jasonRF said:
TL;DR Summary: Do not understand a derivation in Physical Chemistry by McQuarrie and Simon.

The text derives C_p-C_v=nR for ideal gasses. They start with $$H = U + PV = U + nRT$$ for ideal gas. Since U is only a function of temperature for an ideal gas, the right-hand side is only a function of temperature so $$\frac{dH}{dT} = \frac{dU}{dT} + nR$$. Now the text does something I don't understand.

First they set $$\frac{dH}{dT} = \left( \frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_p = C_p$$ Why can they assume constant pressure here? I feel like I am missing something fundamental.

Similarly, they set $$\frac{dU}{dT} = \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T} \right)_V = C_v$$. Again, I don't understand why they can assume constant volume.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks!
Jason
Perhaps a detailed derivation is in order.

Case I: Constant volume
Start with
##H=U+nRT## (definition with ideal gas)
Then
##(dH)_V=(dU)_V+nR~dT##
The first law says
##(dU)_V=(dQ)_V## because the work done by the gas is zero.
Then$$(dH)_V=(dQ)_V+nR~dT \implies \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_V=\left(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial T}\right)_V+nR=C_V+nR.$$Case II: Constant pressure
Start with
##H=U+pV## (definition)
Then
##(dH)_p=(dU)_V+d(pV)=(dU)_p+p~dV.##
The first law says
##(dU)_p=(dQ)_p-pdV##
Then$$(dH)_p=(dQ)_p \implies \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_p=\left(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial T}\right)_p=C_p.$$As @Chestermiller already remarked, ##H## depends only on temperature, i.e. it doesn't matter whether the enthalpy is changing under constant volume or constant pressure. Therefore $$\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_V=\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_p$$ Hence, $$C_p=C_V+nR.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF
Thanks everyone. It makes more sense to me now. My brain can be slow sometimes!

Cheers!

Jason
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K