Derivation of Integral Arc Length Formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the integral arc length formula as presented in "Engineering Mathematics" by Stroud, 6th Edition. A participant expresses confusion regarding the inclusion of a logarithmic term in the formula, specifically questioning its validity in the context of the arc length derivation. The correct formulation, as clarified by another participant, is that the differential arc length is defined as ds/dx = sqrt(1 + (dy/dx)^2), which does not involve a logarithm. This highlights the importance of precise notation in mathematical derivations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives and integrals.
  • Familiarity with the concept of arc length in geometry.
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their applications.
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and formulas accurately.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the arc length formula in calculus textbooks.
  • Review the properties of derivatives and their geometric interpretations.
  • Learn about the applications of arc length in physics and engineering contexts.
  • Explore advanced topics in differential geometry related to curves and surfaces.
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and professionals in engineering or physics who require a solid understanding of arc length derivations and their applications.

El Moriana
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My textbook [Engineering Mathematics, Stroud, 6th Edition, page932] runs through the derivation of the integral formula for arc length. I got confused at one of the steps:

[partial](ds/dx)=sqrt(1+([partial](dy/dx))^2)
if [partial]dx tends to 0,
ds/dx=sqrt(1+log(dy/dx)^2)
s=intab(sqrt(1+(dy/dx)^2))

Where does the log come from and where does it go?

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



N/A
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you post a scan of that page or at least that section with the derivation?

I don't think that log is supposed to be there.

How I learned it was in a curve if you join any two points, the 'x' distance would be Δx and the corresponding 'y' distance would be Δy. The chord length would be related as

(ΔS)2= (Δx)2 +(Δy)2

or

(ΔS/Δx)2 = 1 + (Δy/Δx)2

as Δx→0, Δy/Δx = dy/dx and ΔS/Δx = dS/dx

so

\frac{dS}{dx} = \sqrt{1+ \left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right)}

which you can then integrate.
 
Here we go, apologies for the messy formula earlier, I didnt realize there was a Latex button.
I was expecting exactly what you typed in the derivation, hence the confusion on my part.
 

Attachments

  • Scan_Pic0002.jpg
    Scan_Pic0002.jpg
    32.9 KB · Views: 1,793
I really don't think that 'log' should be there. Else the next step does not make sense.
 
Ok, well thanks for looking it over.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K