# Using dy/dx to find arc length of a parametric equation

• Coderhk
Ok, I see what you mean now, the ##dy/dx## is still in terms of t which is why the the integrand is incorrect. Thank you for clearing that up!f

## Homework Statement

I have attached a picture of the problem in the attachments

I need help on the last section, (part d)

## Homework Equations

(1)##∫√( (dx/dt)^2+(dy/dt)^2)dt##
(2)##∫√( 1+(dy/dx)^2)dx##[/B]

## The Attempt at a Solution

In order to get the answer we just need to find the arc-length of the position curve which could be done using the first equation. However, instead of using the first equation I divided ##dy/dt## by ##dx/dt## to find ##dy/dx##. Using dy/dx I plugged it into the second equation and got a different answer. Why is that so? Shouldn't they both yield the same answer? For both equations I used from 2 to 4 as the limits of integration.

Thanks[/B]

#### Attachments

• b.png
33 KB · Views: 419
Using dy/dx I plugged it into the second equation and got a different answer
I don't see what you do (not clearvoyant). Please post your attempt in full.
For both equations I used from 2 to 4 as the limits of integration.
And why is that ?

I don't see what you do (not clearvoyant). Please post your attempt in full.
And why is that ?
I plugged this into a calculator and got 5.975

#### Attachments

• a.png
9 KB · Views: 372
I plugged this into a calculator and got 5.975
Sure. But x starts at 1 and ends at what you (?) found .

And you have an integrand that is a function of t, not of x. So you either need to express dx as a function of t (and then you are back again to the solution manual), or express the integrand as a function of x, which I think is pretty tough.

Sure. But x starts at 1 and ends at what you (?) found .

And you have an integrand that is a function of t, not of x. So you either need to express dx as a function of t (and then you are back again to the solution manual), or express the integrand as a function of x, which I think is pretty tough.
Wouldn't the limit of integration actually be from 1 to 1.252 (answer from part b), I tried that and I got 0.439. Also, what do you mean by expressing the integrand as a function of x? Isn't it already as a function of x? I just simply plugged it into the formula ##∫√(1+(dy/dx)^2)dx##

I tried
Can't be: you don't have ##t(x)## yet, so you can't integrate. Your result is simply the result of the wrong integration. And "I" got 0.441251 !?
Isn't it already as a function of x?
It certainly is not: dividing two functions of ##t## does not change the ##t## into an ##x## !

Coderhk
Can't be: you don't have ##t(x)## yet, so you can't integrate. Your result is simply the result of the wrong integration. And "I" got 0.441251 !?
It certainly is not: dividing two functions of ##t## does not change the ##t## into an ##x## !
Ok, I see what you mean now, the ##dy/dx## is still in terms of t which is why the the integrand is incorrect. Thank you

BvU